Follow-up to Decision 2003-58 (Decision 2003-4): 8638-C12-200311283
Inter-exchange dark fibre (Show Cause)
List of Interested Parties
Amalgamated with 8638-C12-200312728
Reference: 8340-T42-0883/00
2005-10-21 - Telecom Decision CRTC 2005-63 Issues with respect to the provision of optical fibre. The Commission directs TELUS Communications Inc. to file, within 60 days of this Decision, a general tariff for the provision of interexchange optical fibre in its operating territory. The Commission also directs that if Aliant Telecom Inc., MTS Allstream Inc. or Saskatchewan Telecommunications decide to provide optical fibre, proposed general tariff rates must be filed for approval at the same time as the customer specific tariff. Finally, the Commission finds that it would not be appropriate to confirm its preliminary view expressed in Xit Télécom v. TELUS Québec - Provision of fibre optic private networks , Telecom Decision CRTC 2003-58, 22 August 2003, to forbear from regulating the provision of optical fibre on interexchange private line routes that have been forborne. Reference: 8638-C12-200311283 and 8638-C12-200312728.
2003-11-17 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: SaskTel provides its response to the Comments provided by the parties in the following additional Reply Comments
Document: 031117.doc - 113KB
2003-11-14 - Télébec, société en commandite
Description: Par la présente, Télébec, société en commandite dépose auprès du Conseil, sa réplique aux observations de Allstream Corp. du 3 novembre 2003
Document: 031114.doc - 45KB
2003-11-13 - MTS Communications Inc.
Description: MTS received interventions, dated 3 November 2003, from: Axia SuperNet Ltd. (Axia), Allstream Corp., 360networks/Group Telecom (360nsi) and Xit Telecom (Xit). This submission constitutes MTS's response to these interventions.
Document: 031113.doc - 163KB
2003-11-13 - Axia SuperNet Ltd.
Description: Axia notes that several Parties including MTS, Bell, Aliant have at this time taken the liberty to file comments not contemplated in the schedule for this proceeding. According to the Commissions letter dated October 23, November 3, 2003 was the last date for submissions to the Commission for this proceeding
Document: 031113.htm - 3KB
2003-11-13 - Bell Canada
Description: In Decision 2003-58, Xit Télécom v. TELUS Québec - the Commission initiated a follow-up proceeding that directed Aliant Telecom, TELUS Communications, Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel), MTS Communications and Télébec, société en commandite to show cause why they should not provide intraexchange and interexchange dark fibre pursuant to general tariffs.
Document: 031113_2.doc - 79KB
2003-11-13 - Xit Télécom
Description: Mise en ouvre des Decisions 2003-58 et 2003-59. Observations a l'instance de justification en suivi a la decision 2003-58 de 4089316 Canada Inc operant sous le nom commercial de Xit telecom, en son nom et au nom de Telecommunications Xittel inc.
Document: 031113.doc - 96KB
2003-11-13 - Aliant Telecom Inc.
Description: The following constitutes the reply comments of Aliant Telecom to comments received from 360networks services ltd. and GT Group Telecom Services Corp., Allstream Corp., Axia SuperNet Ltd., Chapleau Energy Services Corporation (collectively "the parties") dated 2003 11 03 concerning the Commission's directions in Decision CRTC 2003-58
Document: 031113.doc - 88KB
2003-11-03 - Xit Télécom
Description: Mise en ouvre des Décisions 2003-58 et 2003-59. Plaidoyers en réplique à l'instance de justification en suivi à la décision 2003-58 de 4089316 Canada Inc opérant sous le nom commercial de Xit télécom, en son nom et au nom de Télécommunications Xittel inc.
Document: 031103_1.doc - 134KB
2003-11-03 - 360networks Services Ltd. and GT Group Telecom Services Corp.
Description: In accordance with the procedures set out in Telecom Decision CRTC 2003-58, the following constitutes the comments of 360networks services ltd. and GT Group Telecom Services Corp. (collectively, 360nsl) on the tariffing of the ILECs' dark fibre services.
Document: 031103.doc - 336KB
2003-11-03 - MTS Communications Inc.
2003-58, MTS Communications responded in a submission dated October 14, 2003, to the Commission's direction that it show cause why it should not be required to provide intra- and inter-exchange dark fibre facilities pursuant to general tariffs
Document: 031103.doc - 137KB
2003-11-03 - Allstream Corp.
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 53 of Telecom Decision CRTC 2003-58 (Decision 03-58), Xit Télécom v. TELUS Québec - Provision of fibre optic private networks, and the Commission's follow‑up letter of 23 October 2003, Allstream provides the following reply comments
Document: 031103.doc - 261KB
2003-11-03 - Télébec, société en commandite
Description: Décision de télécom CRTC 2003-58 - Dimensionnement de réseaux privés de fibres optiques. Réplique aux observations
Document: 031103.doc - 50KB
2003-11-03 - Aliant Telcom Inc.
Description: This is in response to the directions contained in the Commission's letter of 2003 10 23, Follow-up to Decision 2003-58. Aliant Telecom Inc. (Aliant or the Company) is in receipt of submissions from Bell Canada, MTS Communications Inc., Saskatchewan Telecommunications and TELUS Communications Inc., on behalf of itself and TELUS Communications (Québec) Inc. dated 2003 10 14, and from Télébec, société en commandite, dated 2003 10 24, regarding this proceeding.
Document: 031103.doc - 49KB
2003-11-03 - Axia SuperNet Ltd.
Description: The following constitutes the comments of Axia SuperNet Ltd. to the responses of Aliant Telecom, Bell Canada, MTS, SaskTel, TELUS Communications Inc., and Télébec, société en commandite, collectively (the parties) with respect to the Follow-up to Telecom Decisions CRTC 2003-58 and 2003-59
Document: 031103.doc - 95KB
2003-11-03 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: In accordance with paragraphs 47 and 48 of Xit Télécom v. TELUS Québec - Telecom Decision CRTC 2003-58, SaskTel responded to the Commission's direction to show cause why it should not be required to provide intra- and inter-exchange dark fibre facilities pursuant to general tariffs.
Document: 031103.doc - 60KB
2003-11-03 - Bell Canada
Description: In Decision 2003-58, Xit Télécom v. TELUS Québec and Decision 2003-59, Xit Telecom v. Bell Canada, dated 22 August 2003, the Commission initiated a follow-up proceeding that directed Aliant Telecom, TELUS Communications Inc., Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel), MTS Communications Inc. and Télébec, société en commandite to show cause why they should not provide intraexchange and interexchange dark fibre pursuant to general tariffs.
Document: 031103.doc - 73KB
2003-10-24 - Télébec, société en commandite
Description: Télébec présente ci-après ses observations eu égard aux propositions du Conseil et ce, en utilisant la définition de fibre noire proposée par le Conseil
Document: 031024.doc - 179KB
2003-10-23 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Xit Télécom - Subject: Follow-up to Decision 2003-58 - The Commission hereby grants the extension
2003-10-23 - Axia SuperNet Ltd.
Description: Axia has inadvertently misunderstood the Commissions setting of the schedule for the Follow-up proceeding issued 14 October 2003.
Document: 031023.htm - 1KB
2003-10-23 - Xit Télécom
Description: Xit télécom est une partie intéressée aux dossiers des AMT # 6767 et 6769 de Bell Canada et à l'instance de suivi à la décision 2003-58 - Fibres noires intercirconscriptions
Document: 031023.doc - 324KB
2003-10-14 - MTS Communications Inc.
Description: In Xit Télécom v. TELUS Québec - Provision of fibre optic private networks, Telecom Decision CRTC 2003-58, (Decision 2003-58) the Commission directed TELUS Communications (Québec) Inc. (TELUS) to file proposed general tariffs for the provision of "unlit" intra- and inter-exchange fibre optic cable facilities (optical fibre)
Document: 031014.doc - 157KB
2003-10-14 - TELUS Communications Inc.
Description: In accordance with the procedures set out by the Commission in Telecom Decision CRTC 2003-58, as amended by the Commission letter dated September 11, 2003, TELUS Communications Inc., in its own name and on behalf of TELUS Communications (Québec) Inc., herewith files its Comments.
Document: 031014.doc - 84KB
2003-10-14 - Aliant Telecom Inc.
Description: The following constitutes the reply of Aliant Telecom Inc. ("Aliant" or "the Company") to the Commission's directions at paragraphs 47, 48 and 50 of Telecom Decision CRTC 2003-58, Xit Télécom v. TELUS Québec - Provision of fibre optic private networks ("Decision 2003‑58").
Document: 031014.doc - 118KB
2003-10-14 - Bell Canada
Description: In Decision 2003-58, Xit Telecom v. TELUS Québec - Provision of fibre optic private networks and Decision 2003-59, Xit Telecom v. Bell Canada - Provision of fibre optic private networks, the Commission invited parties to file comments on the Commission's preliminary view that the dark fibre facilities market should be forborne on the same routes and to the same extent as has already been forborne for IXPL services. The following constitute Bell Canada's comments.
Document: 031014.doc - 73KB
2003-10-14 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: In Xit Télécom v. TELUS Québec - Provision of fibre optic private networks, Telecom Decision CRTC 2003-58, (Decision 2003-58) the Commission directed TELUS Communications (Québec) Inc. (TELUS) to file proposed general tariffs for the provision of intra- and inter-exchange fibre optic cable facilities (referred to as "dark fibre").
Document: 031014.doc - 71KB
2003-10-14 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Société en commandite Télébec - Subject: Follow-up to Decision 2003-58 - Proceeding
2003-10-10 - Télébec, société en commandite
Description: Télébec demande donc respectueusement au Conseil de lui accorder une prolongation de délai, lui permettant ainsi de déposer ses observations le 24 octobre 2003.
Document: 031010.doc - 40KB
2003-09-11 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Distribution List - Subject: Follow up to Decision 2003-58 - Proceeding
2003-09-10 - MTS Communications Inc.
Description: MTS is in receipt of a letter, dated September 05, 2003, in which Aliant requests an extension to the date of its reply to the Commission's show cause directions in Decision 2003-58.
Document: 030910.doc - 737KB
2003-09-08 - Télébec, Limited Partnership
Description: Télébec received a copy of a letter, dated 05 September 2003, wherein Aliant requests an extension to the date of its reply to the Commission's show cause directions in Decision 2003-58.
Document: 030908.doc - 38KB
2003-09-08 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: In Xit Telecom v. TELUS Québec - Provision of fibre optic private networks, Telecom Decision CRTC 2003-58 (Decision 2003-58), the Commission invited Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel), MTS Communications Inc., Aliant Telecom (Aliant), Société en commandite Télébec and TELUS Communications Inc. (collectively, the Respondents) to show cause within 30 days of the decision why they should not provision optical fibre facilities pursuant to a general tariff
Document: 030908.doc - 53KB
2003-09-05 - Aliant Telecom Inc.
Description: At paragraphs 47, 48 and 50 of Telecom Decision CRTC 2003-58, Xit Télécom v. Telus Québec - Provision of fibre optic private networks ("Decision 2003‑58"), the Commission directed Aliant Telecom Inc. ("Aliant" or "the Company") to show cause within 30 days why it should not provide intra-exchange dark fibre and inter-exchange dark fibre pursuant to a general tariff.
Document: 030905.doc - 38KB
2003-03-23 - Tom Pearce on behalf of Stan Boychuk and the Clayoquot Sound Mamook Broadband Streering Committee
Description: We would like to sumit the following reply comments with respect to the comments submitted by various parties on March 4 2003 and the Telus letter of March 7 2003.
Document: 030323.doc - 21KB
2003-03-19 - Francois D. Ménard
Description: The following reply comments are provided with respect to the comments submitted on January 25th 2003, and the recent interventions made in this file.
Document: 030319.doc - 72KB
2003-03-19 - AT&T Canada
Description: AT&T Canada Telecom Services Company's reply to these comments.
Document: 030319.doc - 87KB
2003-03-19 - TELUS Communications Inc.
Description: TELUS provides its reply to the comments of interested parties to this proceeding.
Document: 030319.doc - 52KB
2003-03-19 - Bell Canada
Description: Telecom Decision CRTC 2003-4 - Requirement for TELUS to file General Tariffs for the Provision of Interexchange Fibre - Reply Comments.
Document: 030319.doc - 68KB
2003-03-19 - Columbia Mountain Open Network (CMON)
Description: Columbia Mountain Open Network reply comments re: Telecom Decision CRTC 2003-4 Telus Communications Inc. Fibre Use and Management Agreement.
Document: 030319.doc - 68KB
2003-03-18 - Francois D. Ménard
Description: As per directives issued in CRTC 2003-4, the following reply comments are provided with respect to the comments submitted on January 25th 2003, and the recent interventions made in this file.
Document: 030318.doc - 62KB
2003-03-05 - Tom Pearce on behalf of Stan Boychuk and the Clayoquot Sound Mamook Broadband Project steering committee
Description: On behalf Stan Boychuk and the entire steering committee we would like to submit the following background and comments.
Document: 030305.doc - 22KB
2003-03-04 - TELUS Communications Inc.
Description: In accordance with the procedures set out by the Commission in Telecom Decision CRTC 2003-4, TELUS Communications Inc. herewith files its Comments.
Document: 030304.zip - 60KB
2003-03-04 - Bell Canada
Description: Decision 2003-4, TELUS Communications Inc. - Fibre Use and Management Agreement initiates a proceeding to consider whether it would be appropriate for TELUS Communications Inc. (TELUS) to provide interexchange fibre pursuant to a General Tariff. Pursuant to paragraph 39 of Decision 2003-4, the following are Bell Canada's comments.
Document: 030304.doc - 74KB
2003-03-04 - District of Sparwood
Description: District of Sparwood Comments on Telecom Decision CRTC 2003-4.
Document: 030304.doc - 93KB
2003-03-04 - AT&T Canada Corp.
Description: The following comments are provided by AT&T Canada Corp. on behalf of itself and AT&T Canada Telecom Services Company (collectively, AT&T Canada) pursuant to paragraphs 36 and 37 of the above-noted decision.
Document: 030304.doc - 82KB
2003-03-03 - Columbia Mountain Open Network (CMON)
Description: Columbia Mountain Open Network comments on Telecom Decision CRTC 2003-4 Telus Communications Inc. Fibre Use and Management Agreement.
Document: 030303.zip - 65KB
"Comments received by alphabetical order"
Broadband Community Champions Consortium (BC3), Matt Wenger
Bureau du Citoyen, Guy St-Julien
Cégep de Matane, Émery Béland
Chapleau Energy Services Corp., Mark Nyman
Columbia Mountain Open Network Inc. (CMON), Jeff Roberts
Commission Scolaire Eastern Shores, Cyrus Journeau
Community of Nakusp Broadband Working Group, Alisatir Skey
Conseil régional de concertation et de développement (CRCD) du Bas-Saint-Laurent, Gilles Gagnon
Conseil régional de développement de l'Abitibi-Témiscamingue, Denis Jodouin, Anny Roy
Corporation of the Village of Montrose, Mike Walsh
C.R.C.D. de la Gaspésie et des Îles-de-la-Madeleine, Gilbert Scantland
District of Sparwood, Danny Dwyer
Gold Trail Open Network Society (GTONS), Paché Denis
MRC d'Avignon, Gaétan Bernatchez
MRC de La Haute-Gaspésie, Michèle Gagnon
Paul Crête, député
Province of British Columbia, John Webb
Regional District of East Kootenay, Greg Deck
Réseau collectif de communications électroniques et d'outils de gestion - Gaspésie / Îles-de-la-Madeleine, Roland Auger
Slocan Valley Economic Development Commission (SVEDC), Derek Murphy
Vancouver Island Open Network Society (VION), Gareth Shearman
Village Council of Radium Hot Springs, Greg Deck
- Date modified: