Microcell Telecom: 8622-M16-01/02
Requesting an order that directs Rogers Wireless and Bell Mobility to cease and desist contravention of section 27(2) of the Telecom Act and directing other specific remedies
2003/04/28 - Telecom Decision CRTC 2003-26 - The Commission denies an application by Microcell Telecommunications Inc. (Microcell) on behalf of itself and its affiliated companies, including Microcell Solutions Inc. (collectively, Microcell) requesting that the Commission order Rogers Wireless Inc. and Bell Mobility Inc. to cease and desist from certain specific conduct in the wireless marketplace that Microcell alleged was contrary to section 27(2) of the Telecommunications Act. Reference: 8622-M16-01/02.
2002/11/11 - Microcell Telecommunications Inc.
Description: We are writing for two reasons. First, we must ask that Bell Mobility immediately cease the unauthorized and improper use of Microcell trademarks. Second, we wish to update and correct the public record in relation to a Part VII Application filed by Microcell on August 30, 2002 before the CRTC and representations made by Bell Mobility in the proceeding initiated by that Application.
Document: 021111.doc - 32KB
2002/09/24 - Microcell Telecommunications Inc.
Description: On Friday afternoon, September 20, 2002, Microcell received a letter from Rogers, containing further comments on the Application. Neither Part VII of the Telecommunications Rules of Procedure, nor the Commission's letter of September 5, 2002 relating to the Application gave Rogers the right to respond to Microcell's Reply Comments of September 17, 2002.
Document: 020924.doc - 24KB
2002/09/20 - Rogers Wireless Inc. (RWI)
Description: Rogers Wireless Inc. (RWI) is in receipt of the Reply Comments filed by Microcell Telecommunications Inc. (Microcell) on September 17, 2002 in the above-referenced proceeding.
Document: 020920.doc - 39KB
2002/09/17 - Microcell Telecommunications Inc.
Description: In accordance with the Commission's directions on procedure issued September 5, 2002, please find enclosed the Reply Comments of Microcell relating to the Application filed on August 30, 2002. In these Reply Comments, Microcell responds to the Answers of Rogers and Bell Mobility, as well as the comments of Telus Communications Inc. ("Telus"), all of which were received on September 12, 2002.
Document: 020917.zip - 344KB
2002/09/12 - TELUS Communications Inc
Description: TELUS Communications Inc. ("TELUS") is in receipt of a Part VII application filed by Microcell Telecommunications Inc. ("Microcell") on behalf of itself and its affiliated companies.
Document: 020912.doc - 57KB
2002/09/12 - Bell Mobility Inc.
Description: Bell Mobility Inc. (Bell Mobility or the Company) is in receipt of an Application (the Application), dated 30 August 2002, from Microcell Telecommunications Inc. on behalf of its affiliates including Microcell Solutions Inc. (collectively, Microcell or the Applicant).
Document: 020912.doc - 94KB
002/09/12 - Rogers Wireless Inc.
Description: This constitutes the answer of Rogers Wireless Inc. (RWI) to the above-referenced application filed by Microcell Telecommunications Inc. (Microcell) on August 30, 2002.
Document: 020912.zip - 211KB
2002/09/05 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Letter addressed to Microcell Telecommunications Inc., Rogers Wireless Inc. and Bell Mobility Inc. - Re: Part VII application by Microcell against Rogers Wireless Inc. and Bell Mobility Inc. for alleged contravention of Section 27(2) of the Telecommunications Act.
2002/08/30 - Microcell Telecommunications Inc.
Description: Microcell Telecommunications Inc. ("Microcell") on behalf of itself and its affiliated companies, including Microcell Solutions Inc. ("Microcell Solutions"), submits the enclosed Application (the "Application") under Part VII of the Telecommunications Rules of Procedure and pursuant to sections 27 and 60 of the Telecommunications Act (the "Act").
Document: 020830.zip - 4837KB
- Date modified: