Bell Canada and Infolink Communications: 8670-B2-02/01

Alleged Tariff Violation



2004-10-04 - Telecom Decision CRTC 2004-65 Infolink Communications Inc. v. Bell Canada - Voicecasting service. Reference: 8670-B2-02/01


2004-09-27 - Bell Canada
Description: Bell herein submits the responses it undertook to provide to the Commission during the Infolink hearing of September 24, 2004.
Document: 040927_1.doc - 39KB

2004-09-27 - Bell Canada
Description: Bell herein submits the response it undertook to provide to Fraser Milner Casgrain during the Infolink hearing of September 24, 2004
Document: 040927.doc - 35KB

2004-09-27 - Fraser Milner Casgrain on behalf of Infolink Communications Ltd.
Description: Please find enclosed Infolink’s responses to undertakings arising from the oral public hearing held on September 24, 2004 in the above-noted matter.
Document: 040927.doc - 55KB

2004-09-27 - Fraser Milner Casgrain on behalf of Infolink Communications Ltd.
Description: Thank you for your email and your request for additional information regarding the statement contained in Infolink's letter to the Commission dated 13 August 2004.
Document: 040927.txt - 3KB

2004-09-24 - John Lesther
Descrition: In the letter dated Aug 13 2004 from Fraser Milner to Ms. Diane Rhéaume of
the CRTC, Fraser Milner claim on behalf of their client claim the following
Documen: 040924.txt - 2KB

2004-09-21 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Letter addressed to Infolink Communications Inc., Fraser Milner Casgrain LLP and Bell Canada - Re: Expedited Process - Organization and Conduct of the Oral Public Hearing

2004-09-14 - Fraser Milner Casgrain on behalf of Infolink Communications Ltd.
Description: In accordance with the directions on procedure that were set out in the Commission’s letter of 30 July 2004, please find attached a list of individuals who will be attending the hearing that has been established by the Commission in connection with the above-referenced matter on behalf of Infolink
Document: 040914.doc - 63KB

2004-09-13 - L. Green
Description: Please stop attempts by INFOLink Canada and similar backdoor voicemail to circumvent CRTC regulations in order to flood our voicemails with harassing advertisements.
Document: 040913.txt - 6KB

2004-09-04 - Nelson King
Description: I would like to add my family's concerns about "voicecasting".
Document: 040904.txt - 4KB

2004-08-16 - Fraser Milner Casgrain on behalf of Infolink Communications Ltd.
Description: In accordance with the Commission's directions on procedure regarding the above-referenced proceeding, please find enclosed the Statement of Argument and Relief Sought of Infolink.
Document: 040816.pdf - 859KB

2004-08-13 - Fraser Milner Casgrain on behalf of Infolink Communications Ltd.
Description: In accordance with the directions on procedure set out in the Commission’s letter of 30 July 2004, please find attached Infolink’s responses to the Commission’s interrogatories as well as its Statement of Argument and Relief Sought
Document: 040813.doc - 170KB

2004-08-13 - Bell Canada
Description: Pursuant to the Commission's letter dated 30 July 2004, attached is Bell Canada's argument in support of its positions in this proceeding, along with its responses to the Commission's interrogatories.
Document: 040813_1.zip - 72KB

2004-07-30 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Infolink Communications Inc., Fraser Milner Casgrain LLP and Bell Canada - Re: Infolink Communications Ltd. v. Bell Canada - Infolink Voicecasting Service

2004-07-09 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Letter addressed to Irving, Mitchell & Associates - Re:Infolink Communications Ltd. v. Bell Canada - Infolink Voicecasting Service

2004-06-24 - Irving, Mitchell & Associates on behalf of Microcell Solutions Inc.
Description:  Further to our telephone conversation, this letter is to confirm that Microcell Solution is seeking intervenor status at the hearing scheduled for July 16 in the above-mentioned matter.
Document: 040624.pdf - 4817KB

2004-06-23 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Letter addressed to Infolink Communications Inc., Fraser Milner Casgrain LLP, Bell Canada - Re: Infolink Communications Ltd. v. Bell Canada - Infolink Voicecasting Service

2004-06-22 - Fraser Milner Casgrain on behalf of Infolink Communications Ltd.
Description: This letter is submitted on behalf of Infolink Communications Ltd. (Infolink) in connection with the above-referenced matter
Document: 040622.doc - 69KB

2004-06-11 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Letter addressed to Infolink Communications Ltd. and Bell Canada - Re: Infolink Communications Ltd. v. Bell Canada - Infolink Voicecasting Service - Questions

2004-06-07 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Infolink Communications Ltd. and Bell Canada - Re: Infolink Communications Ltd. v. Bell Canada - Infolink Voicecasting Service - Hearing Proceeding

2002-10-28 - Bell Canada
Description:  Further to the letter of Commission staff, dated 3 October 2002 , the following constitutes the reply comments of Bell Canada (the Company) to the 18 October 2002 comments of Infolink Voicecasting Service (Infolink) in the above-captioned proceeding
Document: 021028.doc - 70KB

2002-10-25 - Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt on behalf of Infolink Communications Ltd.
Description:  Pursuant to procedures contained in the letter of Commission staff, Dated October 3, 2002, Infolink is pleased to provide its reply comments to the writtent submission of Bell Canada dated October 21, 2002 and received by Infolink tht same day.
Document: 021025.pdf - 341KB

2002-10-21 - Bell Canada
Description:  Further to the letter of Commission staff, dated 3 October 2002 , the following constitutes the comments of Bell Canada (the Company) to the written submissions of Infolink Voicecasting Service (Infolink) in the above-captioned proceeding
Document: 021021.doc - 77KB

2002-10-18 - Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt on behalf of Infolink Communications Ltd.
Description:  By your letter of October 3, 2002, you invited Bell Canada and Infolink Communciations to provide their respective comments on written submissions filed with the Commission by the other party during the latter part of 2001.
Description:  021018.pdf - 563KB

2002-10-03 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Letter addressed to Hosler, Hoskin & Harcourt and Bell Canada - Bell Canada and Inforlink Communications Inc. - Infolink Voicecasting Service

2001-12-07 - Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt on behalf of Infolink Communications Ltd.
Description:  Please find attached the responses to our client, Infolink, to the questions which the Commission has addressed under cover of your letter dated november 13, 2001.
Document: 011207.pdf - 1077KB

2001-11-23 - Bell Canada
Description:  Attached are Bell Canada 's responses to the questions posed by the Commission under cover of your letter dated 13 November 2001.
Document: 011123.doc - 175KB

2001-11-13 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description:  Letter addressed to Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt and Bell Canada - Re: Bell Canada and Infolink Communications Inc. - Infolink Voicecasting Service - Questions

2001-10-09 - Bell Canada
Description:  Reference is made to your letter of 3 october 2001, in which your client alleges that Bell Canada has breached an undertaking not to pursue any complaints or discuss the legality of Infolink's Voicecasting technology with any of Inforlink's customers, pending resolution of Infolink's complaint to the CRTC.
Document: 011009.pdf - 162KB

2001-09-21 - Bell Canada
Description:  As per yesterday's filing re Inforlink, the 2 attachments were filed to the CRTC as hard copy.
Document: 010921.pdf - 169KB

2001-09-20 - Bell Canada
Description:  The following is Bell Canada's response to a requet from the Commission legal counsel, communicated by electronic mail on 18 September 2001, for "a brief written statement that describes the services that Infolink is providing, how it is doing and why Bell believes that it is entitled to disconnect Infolink unde the provision of General Tarif Item 1800".
Document: 010920.pdf - 540KB

2001-09-17 - Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt on behalf of Infolink Communications Ltd.
Description:  In response to a request contained in an e-mail message received on Friday, September 14, 2001 from Commission Staff, we hereby provide a written statement on behalf of our client, Infolink, which identifies certain services provided by Infolink to its customers, discusses the manner in which infolink Voicecasting service is provisioned and addresses the extent to which the service is or is not subject to the terms of Bell Canada's General Tariff Item 1800
Document: 010917.pdf - 348KB

2001-09-07 - Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt on behalf of Infolink Communications Ltd.
Description:  Bell Canada vs. Infolink Communications Ltd. - Bell Canada Executive Complaint
Document: 040907.pdf - 261KB


Date modified: