2009-04-07 - #8740-C6-200905812 - Cogeco Cable Inc. - AMT 25 - Tarif général - Modifications au service d'accès Internet aux tierces parties (AITP)
Veuillez noter que la description qui suit la désignation du document nous a été fournie par une entité non assujettie à la Loi sur les langues officielles et est donc offerte à gracieux seulement. Ainsi, la description est dans la langue dans laquelle elle nous a été transmise.
2010-12-23 - Ordonnance de Télécom CRTC 2010-969 Cogeco Cable Inc. – Tarifs du service d’accès Internet de tiers et frais de facturation à l’utilisation
Numéros de dossiers : Avis de modification tarifaire 24, 25, 26, 27, 27A et 31
2009-04-22 - Ordonnance de Télécom CRTC 2009-211 Ordonnance simplifiée
Le Conseil approuve provisoirement les demandes tarifaires suivantes :
AMT 340 et 340A (Aliant Telecom) de Bell Aliant; AMT 25 de Cogeco Cable Inc.
2009-05-23 - Matan, Daniel
Description: I am writing regarding Cogeco's submission to amend the tariff to include Excessive Usage Billing for TPIA services, File # 8740-C6-20090581.
Document: 1148827.pdf - 36KBO
2009-05-22 - Cogeco Câble inc.
Description: Cogeco Cable Inc. (Cogeco) is in receipt of comments dated 20 May 2009
from Vianet on Cogeco Tariff Notice No. 25 (TN 25) in which Cogeco proposed to modify the additional usage charge for Cogeco’s TPIA Service by applying 1) a specific charge per modem per GB for usage in excess of the bandwidth limitation related to each Speed Tier of Cogeco’s TPIA Service; and, 2) a specific maximum additional usage charge per month to each Speed Tier.
Document: 1148610.pdf - 37KBO
2009-05-20 - Vianet
Description: Cogeco Cable Inc. (“Cogeco”) Tariff Notice No. 25 (“TN 25”) has recently come to the attention of Vianet. In the case of prior tariff notices relating to its third party Internet access (“TPIA”) service, Cogeco has provided its wholesale customers, including Vianet, with copies of those tariff notices within a day of filing the tariff notices with the Commission. In the case of TN 25 this did not occur despite the fact that TN 25, if approved, would have a very significant negative impact on Cogecos’s wholesale customers and the end-users of those wholesale customers. In light of this sequence of events, TN 25 only came to Vianet’s attention after the customary thirty day period for interventions had expired. Accordingly, Vianet is only now in a position to file this intervention and requests the Commission’s indulgence in that regard.
Document: 1140313.pdf - 502KO
Mise à jour : 2010-12-23
- Date de modification :