Cogeco Cable Inc. - TN 25 - 2009-04-07 - #8740-C6-200905812

General Tarif - Revisions to the Third Party Internet Access (TPIA) Service

Please note that the description following the name of the document has been supplied by an entity not subject to the Official Languages Act and is therefore offered as a courtesy only. Thus, the description is in the language in which it was transmitted to us.

2010-12-23 - Telecom Order CRTC 2010-969 Cogeco Cable Inc. – Third-party Internet access rates and usage-based billing charges
File numbers: Cogeco Tariff Notices 24, 25, 26, 27, 27A, and 31

2009-04-22 - Telecom orders CRTC 2009-211 Streamlined order
The Commission approves on an interim basis the following tariff applications:
Bell Aliant TNs 340 and 340A (Aliant Telecom); Cogeco Cable Inc. TN 25.


2009-05-23 - Matan, Daniel
Description: I am writing regarding Cogeco's submission to amend the tariff to include Excessive Usage Billing for TPIA services, File # 8740-C6-20090581.
Document: 1148827.pdf - 36KB

2009-05-22 - Cogeco Câble inc.
Description: Cogeco Cable Inc. (Cogeco) is in receipt of comments dated 20 May 2009
from Vianet on Cogeco Tariff Notice No. 25 (TN 25) in which Cogeco proposed to modify the additional usage charge for Cogeco’s TPIA Service by applying 1) a specific charge per modem per GB for usage in excess of the bandwidth limitation related to each Speed Tier of Cogeco’s TPIA Service; and, 2) a specific maximum additional usage charge per month to each Speed Tier.
Document: 1148610.pdf - 37KB

2009-05-20 - Vianet
Description: Cogeco Cable Inc. (“Cogeco”) Tariff Notice No. 25 (“TN 25”) has recently come to the attention of Vianet. In the case of prior tariff notices relating to its third party Internet access (“TPIA”) service, Cogeco has provided its wholesale customers, including Vianet, with copies of those tariff notices within a day of filing the tariff notices with the Commission. In the case of TN 25 this did not occur despite the fact that TN 25, if approved, would have a very significant negative impact on Cogecos’s wholesale customers and the end-users of those wholesale customers. In light of this sequence of events, TN 25 only came to Vianet’s attention after the customary thirty day period for interventions had expired. Accordingly, Vianet is only now in a position to file this intervention and requests the Commission’s indulgence in that regard.
Document: 1140313.pdf - 502KB

Date modified: