ARCHIVED - Telecom Commission Letter addressed to Stan Thompson (Northwestel Inc.)
This page has been archived on the Web
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. Archived Decisions, Notices and Orders (DNOs) remain in effect except to the extent they are amended or reversed by the Commission, a court, or the government. The text of archived information has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Changes to DNOs are published as “dashes” to the original DNO number. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us.
Ottawa, 5 April 2019
Our reference: 8740-N1-201902031
BY EMAIL
Mr. Stan Thompson
Chief Financial Officer & Vice-President, Corporate Services
Northwestel Inc.
301 Lambert St., Box 2727 3rd Floor
Whitehorse, Yukon Territory Y1A4Y4
regulatoryaffairs@nwtel.ca
Re: Tariff Notice 1042 – Special Services Tariff item 775, Special Assembly #7 Layer 2 Ethernet WAN Service
Dear Sir:
On 25 March 2019, the Commission received an application from Northwestel in which the company proposed changes to item 775 – Special Assembly #7 – Layer 2 Ethernet WAN service.
Paragraph 28(1) (a) of the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission Rules of Practice and Procedure provides that the Commission may require parties to file information or documents where needed.
Northwestel is requested to provide a comprehensive answers, including rationale and any supporting information, to the attached questions by 16 April 2019.
Sincerely,
Original signed by
Michel Murray
Director, Dispute Resolution & Regulatory Implementation
Telecommunications Sector
c.c.: Joanne Baldassi, CRTC, 819-997-3498, joanne.baldassi@crtc.gc.ca
Wendy Ellis, Bell Aliant, wendy.ellis@bellaliant.ca
Attach. (1)
Requests for information
1. The Table 2 CSA imputation test results submitted in the Attachment in support of TN 1042 are based on a three year study period. Under the previous filing, TN 1023, the CSA imputation test results in Table 1 of Attachment 1 are based on a longer study period.
- Explain, with supporting rationale, the variation in CSA revenues in the TN 1042 price floor test compared to the previous price floor test filed under TN 1023, caused by factors other than the shorter study period.
- Explain, with supporting rationale, the variation in forborne service and other component costs in the TN 1042 price floor test compared to the previous price floor test filed under TN 1023, caused by factors other than the shorter study period.
- Date modified: