ARCHIVED - Telecom Commission Letter addressed to Gloria Desorcy (Consumers’ Association of Canada Manitoba)
This page has been archived on the Web
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. Archived Decisions, Notices and Orders (DNOs) remain in effect except to the extent they are amended or reversed by the Commission, a court, or the government. The text of archived information has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Changes to DNOs are published as “dashes” to the original DNO number. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us.
Ottawa, 1 March 2019
Our reference: 1011-NOC2018-0246; 4754-617
Gloria Desorcy, Executive Director
Consumers’ Association of Canada Manitoba
RE: Report regarding the retail sales practices of Canada’s large telecommunications carriers, Telecom and Broadcasting Notice of Consultation CRTC 2018-246 – Request for Information
Dear Ms. Desourcy,
On 10 December 2018, the Commission received an application for costs from the Manitoba Branch of the Consumers’ Association of Canada and Winnipeg Harvest (collectively, the Manitoba Coalition) with respect to its participation inTelecom and Broadcasting Notice of Consultation CRTC 2018-246, Report regarding the retail sales practices of Canada’s large telecommunications carriers (the hearing).
The purpose of this letter is to request additional information from the Manitoba Coalition regarding its application for costs.
In its application, the Manitoba Coalition claimed disbursements (please refer to Exhibit A of the application) including,
- $56.56 for “Oscar’s Deli – lunch meeting”
- $330 for “Samantha Neufeld Invoice”
Please describe the nature of these disbursements in greater detail and address why they are considered necessary and reasonable expenses with references, where appropriate, to the Commission’s Guidelines for the Assessment of Costs in Telecom Regulatory Policy CRTC 2010-963 (the Guidelines).
In its application, the Manitoba Coalition included in-house consultant fees for Gloria Desorcy for a total of $2,700 using a rate of $240 (please refer to Form III Summary of Consultant and Analyst Fees of the application). According to the Guidelines, an in-house consultant’s fees are to be calculated using the daily rate of $470. Commission staff would like to clarify whether the rate of $240 was used to calculate Ms. Desorcy’s consultant fees in error.
Filing Information with the Commission
The requested information is to be filed with the Commission by 11 March 2019 (10 days). Any other interested party may file a response by 18 March 2019 (5 days). The Council may reply to any comments no later than 25 March 2019 (5 days). All filings are to be provided to all persons copied within this letter.
A copy of this letter and all related correspondence will be added to the public record of the proceeding.
If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me at (613) 697-4027 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
In the meantime, the Commission is continuing its review of this costs application.
originally signed by
c.c.: Distribution List
Bell Canada email@example.com;
Canadian Association of the Deaf-Association des Sourds du Canada
Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic firstname.lastname@example.org;
Canadian National Society of the Deaf-Blind email@example.com
Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc. firstname.lastname@example.org
Cogeco Connexion Inc. email@example.com;
Commission for Complaints for Telecom-television Services Geoff.White@ccts-cprst.ca; firstname.lastname@example.org;
Consumers Council of Canada; email@example.com
Deaf Wireless Canada Consultative Committee firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org
Deafness Advocacy Association Nova Scotia email@example.com
Forum for Research and Policy in Communications firstname.lastname@example.org;
Northwestel Inc. email@example.com;
OpenMedia Engagement Network firstname.lastname@example.org;
Public Interest Advocacy Centre email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org;
Rogers Communications Canada Inc.email@example.com;
Saskatchewan Telecommunications firstname.lastname@example.org;
Shaw Communications Inc. email@example.com;
TbayTel firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; David.Wilkie@tbaytel.com;
TekSavvy Solutions Inc. firstname.lastname@example.org;
TELUS Communications Inc. email@example.com;
Union des consommateurs firstname.lastname@example.org;
Videotron Ltd. email@example.com;
Xplornet Communications Inc. firstname.lastname@example.org;
- Date modified: