ARCHIVED - Telecom Commission Letter adressed to Cogeco Communications Inc.
This page has been archived on the Web
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. Archived Decisions, Notices and Orders (DNOs) remain in effect except to the extent they are amended or reversed by the Commission, a court, or the government. The text of archived information has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Changes to DNOs are published as “dashes” to the original DNO number. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us.
Ottawa, 2 November 2018
Our reference: 8646-C12-201807611
Mr. Leonard D. Eichel
Senior Director, Regulatory Affairs, Telecommunications
Cogeco Communications Inc.
5 Place Ville-Marie, Suite 1700
Montréal, Quebec H3B 0B3
RE: Net Neutrality - Review of ISP Practices – List of respondents
Dear Mr. Eichel:
In a letter dated 9 October 2018, Cogeco Connexion Inc. (Cogeco) commented on the fact-finding exercise initiated by Commission staff on 26 September 2018 regarding the net neutrality practices of certain Internet Service Providers (ISPs).
In particular, Cogeco requested that the same fact-finding questions that were issued to the ISPs identified in staff’s letter be issued to other reseller ISPs operating throughout Canada as well. In Cogeco’s view, this would assist in gaining a fuller perspective on the Internet traffic management and differential pricing practices that may be in place in the Canadian broadband retail Internet market.
Cogeco proposed that, at the very least, these questions should also be issued to all members of the Canadian Network Operators Consortium (CNOC).
Commission staff would like to thank Cogeco for its input regarding this fact-finding exercise. For the time being, the list of ISPs covered by the 26 September 2018 Commission staff letter will remain as initially set out. However, this does not preclude the initiation of further compliance monitoring activities with different scopes in the future.
Original signed by
Director, Dispute Resolution and Regulatory Implementation
c.c.: Martin Brazeau, CRTC, firstname.lastname@example.org
Bell Canada, email@example.com
Bragg Communications Incorporated, carrying on business as Eastlink, Regulatory.Matters@corp.eastlink.ca
Rogers Communications Canada Inc., firstname.lastname@example.org
Saskatchewan Telecommunications, email@example.com
Shaw Communications Inc., Regulatory@sjrb.ca
TekSavvy Solutions Inc., firstname.lastname@example.org
TELUS Communications Inc., email@example.com
Vidéotron Ltd., firstname.lastname@example.org
Xplornet Communications Inc., email@example.com