Telecom Commission Letter Addressed to Robert Van Aaken (Tuckersmith Communications Co-operative Limited)
27 September 2018
Our reference: 1011-NOC2016-0293
Mr. Robert Van Aaken
Tuckersmith Communications Co-operative Limited
RE: Revised Wireless Code Implementation – 2018 Compliance Reports – Request for further information
Dear Mr. Van Aaken,
This letter sets out follow-up questions about Tuckersmith’s compliance with the revised Wireless CodeFootnote1.
On 15 February 2018, Commission staff sent a letter, titled Revised Wireless Code Implementation – Compliance Reports, which set out specific questions for wireless service providers to answer in their compliance reports for the revised Wireless Code. These reports were due by 31 March 2018.
Commission staff reviewed Tuckersmith’s report and considers that certain elements require further clarification.
Therefore, Tuckersmith is are asked to file answers to the attached questions on or before 9 October 2018.
As set out in Broadcasting and Telecom Information Bulletin 2010-961, Procedures for filing confidential information and requesting its disclosure in Commission proceedings, WSPs may designate certain information as confidential. WSPs must provide an abridged version of the document involved, accompanied by a detailed rationale to explain why the disclosure of the information is not in the public interest.
These materials may be incorporated into the record of a potential future proceeding evaluating WSP compliance with the revised Wireless Code and assessing whether remedial measures are appropriate in the circumstances.
For further information on how to submit your response, see the CRTC’s web page Submitting applications and other documents to the CRTC using My CRTC Account.
If you have any questions, please contact Meghan Wawryk, Senior Analyst, Social and Consumer Policy, at 819 635-6959 or email@example.com.
(Original signed by)
Chief Consumer Officer, Consumer Affairs and Strategic Policy
- In the Commission staff letter dated 15 February 2018, question 5.e. states “Provide an example of the text used and describe the delivery method(s) you employ when notifying a customer on a fixed-term contract at least 90 calendar days before the end of their initial commitment period whether or not the contract will be automatically extended.”
Explain how, in your view, Tuckersmith’s response satisfies all of section G. 6 (ii) of the revised Code, which requires that:
“(ii) A service provider must notify a customer on a fixed-term contract at least 90 calendar days before the end of their initial commitment period whether or not the contract will be automatically extended. This notification must include
- the date on which the contract is set to expire;
- a statement informing the customer that as of that date, they can switch plans, change services providers, or cancel their service without penalty; and
- information explaining
- whether the contract will be automatically extended with the same rates, terms, and conditions, on a month-to-month basis; and
- if the contract is not being automatically extended, the proposed new minimum monthly charge for service going forward.” (emphasis added)
- Question 6.f. of the Commission staff letter dated 15 February 2018 requested that Tuckersmith submit the web link that demonstrates compliance with the Commission direction at paragraph 327 of Telecom Regulatory Policy 2017-200 (requiring WSPs to “promote the availability of the extended trial period in the accessibility portion of their websites by 1 December 2017”). In response, Tuckersmith indicated that it will not be in compliance with this requirement until 1 June 2018. Please provide the link that demonstrates Tuckersmith is now in compliance with this requirement.
- Date modified: