ARCHIVED - Telecom Procedural Letter Addressed to Cynthia Khoo (OpenMedia Engagement Network) and Steven Schmidt (TELUS Communications Company)

This page has been archived on the Web

Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. Archived Decisions, Notices and Orders (DNOs) remain in effect except to the extent they are amended or reversed by the Commission, a court, or the government. The text of archived information has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Changes to DNOs are published as “dashes” to the original DNO number. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us.

Ottawa, 1 November 2017

Our reference:  1011-NOC2017-0112


Ms. Cynthia Khoo
External Counsel
OpenMedia Engagement Network

Mr. Steven Schmidt
Vice-President – Telecom Policy & Chief Regulatory Legal Counsel
Telecom Policy & Regulatory Affairs
TELUS Communications Company

Re:  Development of the Commission’s broadband funding regime, Telecom Notice of Consultation 2017-112 Supplementary Filing of OpenMedia Engagement Network

Dear Madam, Sir:

This letter is in response to OpenMedia Engagement Network’s (OpenMedia) procedural request, received 18 August 2017, to file supplementary comments in order to remedy a gap in its intervention, dated 28 June 2017. This request drew attention to reported struggles that the Village of Kaslo, British Columbia, faced in obtaining high-speed broadband Internet access, involving both Kaslo infoNet (KiN), an Internet Service Provider (ISP), and purportedly TELUS Communications Company (TELUS). OpenMedia explained that it had expected that KiN would intervene on its own behalf in order to provide the Commission, and record, with substantiating details regarding such reported struggles, but learned after the first intervention deadline that KiN had not intervened.

In response, by letter dated 23 August 2017, TELUS submitted that the allegations that OpenMedia makes in its intervention in paragraphs 26 and 30 are profoundly improper as they are based on mere “common knowledge” and multiple degrees of hearsay that are often anonymous, and are thus highly unreliable.

TELUS requested that the Commission make an order striking paragraphs 26 and 30 of OpenMedia’s original intervention and denying leave to OpenMedia to file its supplementary submission, including the redacted email from KiN to Kaslo Village Council regarding TELUS’ activities. TELUS submitted that to the extent that the Commission determines not to strike this evidence from the record, these statements should in any event be given no weight. In the alternative, TELUS requested that it be given 45 days to file a response to these allegations as TELUS anticipates that it will take a significant amount of time to investigate these allegations because many of them are anonymous or based on “common knowledge” and are over a decade old.

In a letter dated 25 August 2017, in response to OpenMedia and TELUS’ request, Commission staff indicated that a Commission determination would be forthcoming with respect to the above procedural request and, if necessary, additional process would follow.

By letter dated 29 August 2017, OpenMedia submitted that upon realizing that there was an unexpected and unintended deficiency in the record, OpenMedia made all reasonable efforts to remedy the issue. OpenMedia argued that KiN’s statement and evidence are materially relevant to issues central to the broadband funding proceeding. Specifically, they have argued that the statement illustrates potential roadblocks that local, small, non-profit, community, and/or municipal broadband initiatives may encounter and provides the Commission with an opportunity to act to remove or prevent them, or otherwise provide for such possibilities in its broadband funding regime design, to ensure that these players can access funding and deploy networks on an equal playing field unhindered. OpenMedia submitted that if the Commission accepts OpenMedia’s supplementary filings, providing TELUS with an opportunity to respond will cure concerns of prejudice and ensure procedural fairness.

OpenMedia requested that the Commission:

  1. Accept OpenMedia’s supplemental filing;
  2. Deny TELUS’ request to strike paragraphs 26 and 30 from OpenMedia’s intervention;
  3. Accept and retain the confidentiality of Exhibit B in KiN’s statement (KiN’s email to Kaslo Village Council); and
  4. Provide TELUS with a reasonable opportunity to respond, within the timeline of the current proceeding, whether in the form of requests for information or otherwise.

OpenMedia’s position, as set out in paragraphs 25 to 32 of its intervention, is that the broadband funding regime should not reward “bad behavior” such as where “market forces have impeded alternatives”. In paragraph 26 of its intervention, OpenMedia has provided an anecdote regarding historical interactions between KiN and TELUS in order to support its broad statement that “reports and anecdotes abound regarding various community or municipal ISPs’ battles with the incumbent ISPs in their respective regions.” In paragraph 30 of its intervention, OpenMedia then characterizes the behavior of “private sector, profit-motivated ISPs” that “devote resources towards actively hindering or impeding communities’ self-driven efforts to respond to these business decisions with their own solutions” as “unconscionable”.

With respect to TELUS’ request that the Commission strike paragraphs 26 and 30 from OpenMedia’s intervention, the Commission considers the details of the alleged interactions between TELUS and KiN to be anecdotal in nature and that the Commission can receive such evidence, giving it the weight it deserves. Therefore, to the extent that these paragraphs provide limited anecdotal evidence to support OpenMedia’s general position as set out in paragraph 32Footnote1, paragraphs 26 and 30 should remain on the record.

With respect to OpenMedia’s supplemental filing, given that the further details provided regarding the alleged interactions between TELUS and KiN are also anecdotal and unsubstantiated, the supplemental filing therefore does not add to the record and is not required to further support OpenMedia’s general position as set out in paragraph 32.

Accordingly, the Commission denies TELUS’ procedural request to strike paragraphs 26 and 30 from OpenMedia’s intervention and denies OpenMedia’s supplemental filing, including KiN’s email to Kaslo Village Council.

Yours sincerely,

Original signed by

Scott Hutton
Acting Secretary General

c.c.:  Kim Wardle, CRTC, 819-997-494,

Distribution List

Bell Canada
Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc.
Cogeco Communications Inc.  
Rogers Communications Canada Inc.
Shaw Communications Inc.
SSi Micro Ltd.  
First Mile Connectivity Consortium
Government of Yukon
County of Warner (AB)
Député fédéral - Montmagny, L'Islet, Kamouraska et Rivière-du-Loup
MRC de Mékinac
MRC de Témiscouata
Municipalité de St-Adelphe
Powell River Regional District
Prince Township (ON)
Strathcona County (AB)
ville de rimouski (district Sainte-Blandine/Mont-Lebel)
Adamee Itorcheak
Adams, Ryan C.
Heitner, Howard
Legault, Sophie
Luxmore, Daniel
McKelvey, Fenwick
Riley, Patrick
Roman, John
Rothschild & Co.
Thomas Howell
3C Information Solutions Incorporated
British Columbia Broadband Association (BCBA)
Canadian Cable Systems Alliance Inc. (CCSA)
Déry Télécom inc.
Eeyou Communications Network
Galaxy Broadband Communications Inc.
Lemalu Holdings Ltd. O/A MCSNet
Southwestern Integrated Fibre Technology Inc. (SWIFT)
TekSavvy Solutions Inc.
Telesat Canada
Xplornet Communications Inc.
Members of Parliament Hastings-Lennox and Addington/ Laurentides-Labelle
Alberta Association of Municipal Districts and Counties
Association of Manitoba Municipalities (AMM)
Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM)
Fédération québécoise des municipalités
Saskatchewan Association of Rural Municipalities (SARM)
Alberta SouthWest Regional Alliance
All Nations Trust Company
BC Libraries Cooperative
Blue Sky Economic Growth Corp (Blue Sky Net)
Canadian Telecommunications Contribution Consortium Inc.
Columbia Basin Broadband Corporation (CBBC)
Corridor Communications Inc. (CCI)
Fédération des chambres de commerce du Québec (FCCQ)
Inuvialuit Regional Corporation
National Campus and Community Radio Association (NCRA-ANREC)
Nunavut Economic Forum Coalition
Nunavut Library Association
One Nation Networks, a Division of WiBand Communications Corp.
School of Library and Information Studies, University of Alberta
TCPub Media Inc.
The English-Language Arts Network (ELAN)
West Parry Sound SMART Community Inc.
Deputy Minister - Government of the Northwest Territories
Government of Manitoba | Growth, Enterprise and Trade | Marketing and Sector Intelligence
Government of Newfoundland and Labrador
Government of Nunavut
Kativik Regional Government (KRG)
Ministère de l'Économie de la Science et de l'Innovation/ Ministère de la Culture et des Communications
Ministry of Technology, Innovation and Citizens of Province of British Columbia
Ontario Ministry of Infrastructure On behalf of various parties cam.whitehead@ontario.can
Province of Nova Scotia, Department of Business
Service Alberta
National Pensions Federation and the Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC)
Quebecor Media

Date modified: