ARCHIVED - Telecom Procedural Letter addressed to Distribution List
This page has been archived on the Web
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. Archived Decisions, Notices and Orders (DNOs) remain in effect except to the extent they are amended or reversed by the Commission, a court, or the government. The text of archived information has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Changes to DNOs are published as “dashes” to the original DNO number. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us.
Ottawa, 9 June 2017
Our reference: 8690-C126-201612250
RE: Change of schedule and process for addressing the City of Calgary’s Part 1 Application dated 28 November 2016
Dear Madam, Sir:
In a letter dated 30 May 2017, the Commission denied a request by Bell Canada, Rogers Communications, Shaw Communications Inc., TELUS Communications Company and Zayo Canada (collectively, the Carriers) to suspend consideration of the City of Calgary’s (Calgary) Part1 Application. The Commission also re-established the process for Calgary’s Application by setting out different dates for the filing of submissions and reply comments regarding the rights-of-way (ROW) Bylaw and the proposed Municipal Consent and Access Agreement (MCAA).
By letter dated 6 June 2017, Calgary requested that the Commission revise the schedule and process set out in its 30 May 2017 letter such that submissions and reply comments regarding both the ROW Bylaw and the MCAA would be filed at the same time.
By Commission staff letter dated 6 June 2017, the Carriers were requested to respond to Calgary’s procedural request by 8 June 2017.
By letter dated 7 June 2017, the Carriers (excluding Zayo Canada), stated that they did not object to Calgary’s proposed revisions to the schedule and process.
In view of the above, the schedule and process set out in the Commission’s letter dated 30 May 2017 are modified as follows:
- the Carriers may file an answer and interested parties may file an interverntion on Calgary’s Application by 30 June 2017, serving copies on Calgary. Calgary may file reply comments by 25 July 2017, serving copies on the Carriers and any interested parties.
The Carriers are reminded that they are required to identify in detail which sections of the proposed MCAA each carrier contests and propose alternate wording.
Original signed by
Director, Dispute Resolution and Regulatory Implementation
City of Calgary, email@example.com;
Bell Canada, firstname.lastname@example.org;
Rogers Communications, email@example.com;
Shaw Communications Inc., firstname.lastname@example.org;
TELUS Communications Company, email@example.com;
Zayo Canada, firstname.lastname@example.org;
The Federation of Canadian Municipalities, email@example.com;
- Date modified: