ARCHIVED - Telecom Commission Letter Addressed to Jacob Friedman (Xplornet Communications Inc.)
This page has been archived on the Web
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. Archived Decisions, Notices and Orders (DNOs) remain in effect except to the extent they are amended or reversed by the Commission, a court, or the government. The text of archived information has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Changes to DNOs are published as “dashes” to the original DNO number. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us.
Ottawa, 18 April 2017
Our reference: 8740-X9-201702142
Mr. Jacob Friedman
Xplornet Communications Inc.
625 Cochrane Drive, Suite 1000
Markham, ON L3R 9R9
Re: Xplornet Communications Inc. Tariff Notice 2 - Proposed Revisions to Access Services Tariff
On 16 March 2016, the Commission received an application by Xplornet Communications Inc. under Tariff Notice (TN) 2, proposing revisions to its Access Services Tariff item 300 – Interconnection with Interexchange Service Providers (IXSPs).
Xplornet noted that it provides service as a Type IV competitive local exchange carrier (CLEC)Footnote1 but it had exceeded 10,000 customers and was considering the obligation to transition to a Type III CLEC.Footnote2
Xplornet noted that the interexchange equal access obligations of a Type III CLEC were not compatible with its network and service partners, and requested an exemption from certain Type III CLEC obligations, including the requirement to file tariffs to provide interexchange equal access.
Xplornet submitted that it filed TN 2 only as an alternative to the Commission granting such an exemption in respect of equal access. Xplornet stated that it intends to withdraw TN 2 if its request for an exemption is approved.
Commission staff has reviewed Xplornet’s TN 2 application. Commission staff notes that Xplornet’s request for an exemption from the above-noted requirements should properly be
submitted as a Part I applicationFootnote3 so that interested parties can participate in a proceeding to dispose of the application.
The outcome of such a proceeding would determine whether or not Xplornet would be required to revise its CLEC tariff to provide interexchange equal access.
Accordingly, this file is closed.
Original signed by
Director, Dispute Resolution & Regulatory Implementation
c.c.: Joseph Cabrera, CRTC, 819-934-6352, firstname.lastname@example.org
Yael Wexler, email@example.com
- Date modified: