ARCHIVED - Telecom Commission Letter Addressed to Philippe Gauvin (Bell Canada)
This page has been archived on the Web
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. Archived Decisions, Notices and Orders (DNOs) remain in effect except to the extent they are amended or reversed by the Commission, a court, or the government. The text of archived information has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Changes to DNOs are published as “dashes” to the original DNO number. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us.
Ottawa, 2 February 2017
Our reference: 8640-B2-201600049
Mr. Philippe Gauvin
160 Elgin Street, 19th Floor
Ottawa, Ontario K2P 2C4
Re: Part 1 Application by Bell Canada regarding Forbearance of Wholesale Unbundled Relay Services
Dear Mr. Gauvin:
This letter is in regards to a Part 1 application, dated January 6, 2016, in which Bell Canada (Bell) requested, among other things, that the CRTC refrain from exercising its powers and performing its duties under certain sections of the Telecommunications Act in relation to Bell’s Wholesale Unbundled Relay Services (WURS).
As announced in the CRTC 2016-2017 Report on Plans and Priorities, the CRTC published Telecom Notice of Consultation 2017-33 today to initiate a review of the regulatory framework for message relay service (MRS). The upcoming process will allow for an examination of wholesale and retail MRS issues on a holistic basis, and will give all interested parties (e.g. Local Exchange Carriers, public interest groups and Canadians who are Deaf, hard of hearing or speech-impaired) an opportunity to provide comments.
Accordingly, the CRTC is closing the Bell application related to this matter, as the issues raised may be rendered moot by the determinations arising from this proceeding. By closing the application, the CRTC is not ruling on its merits.
Once the process has been concluded and a decision issued, Bell may choose, if it deems necessary, to file a new application regarding WURS that takes into consideration the outcomes of the proceeding.
c.c.: Laura Jung, Laurajung@outlook.com
Managed Network Systems Inc., email@example.com
TELUS Communications Company, firstname.lastname@example.org
Canadian Network Operators Consortium Inc., email@example.com
- Date modified: