ARCHIVED - Telecom Commission Letter Addressed to Esther Snow (Shaw Communications Inc.)
This page has been archived on the Web
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. Archived Decisions, Notices and Orders (DNOs) remain in effect except to the extent they are amended or reversed by the Commission, a court, or the government. The text of archived information has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Changes to DNOs are published as “dashes” to the original DNO number. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us.
Ottawa, 20 October 2016
Our reference: 8740-S9-201607342
Manager, Regulatory Affairs
Shaw Communications Inc.
40 Elgin Street, Suite 1400
Ottawa, Ontario K1P 5K6
RE: Shaw Tariff Notice 27
On 15 July 2016, the Commission received an application from Shaw Cablesystems G.P. (Shaw), under cover of Tariff Notice 27 (TN 27), in which the company proposed changes to its General Tariff CRTC 26300 – Third Party Internet Access (TPIA) service. The company proposed, pending approval of TN 26/A and the proposed switch from a flat rate billing model to a capacity based billing (CBB) model, the Commission provide interim approval of a new 150 Megabits per second (Mbps) wholesale HSA service speed with a flat rate based on the approved flat rate of Shaw’s existing 120 Mbps service.
By way of background, the Commission received an application from Shaw, under cover of Tariff Notice 26/A (TN 26/A), dated 15 July 2016, in which the company proposed to introduce a new 150 Mbps service speed within the proposed speed band of 130 to 250 Mbps. This was a part of Shaw’s TN 26, filed 30 June 2016, which included a proposal to switch from a flat rate billing model to a CBB model. In Telecom Order CRTC 2016-396, dated 6 October 2016, the Commission approved TN 26/A on an interim basis effective the date of the order, including the proposed speed band and approval to move to a CBB model.
In light of the Commission’s interim approval of TN 26/A in Telecom Order CRTC 2016-396, Commission staff considers that the disposition of TN 27 becomes moot. Accordingly, Shaw’s application TN 27 is closed.
Original signed by
Director, Competitor Services and Costing Implementation
c. c.: Doug Thurston, CRTC, 819-997-4579, firstname.lastname@example.org
Nathan Jarrett, CRTC, 819- 635-6488, email@example.com
- Date modified: