ARCHIVED - Telecom Procedural Letter Addressed to distribution list

This page has been archived on the Web

Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. Archived Decisions, Notices and Orders (DNOs) remain in effect except to the extent they are amended or reversed by the Commission, a court, or the government. The text of archived information has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Changes to DNOs are published as “dashes” to the original DNO number. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us.

Ottawa, 13 September 2016

Our reference:  8622-T151-201609562

By Email

Mr. Sandeep Panesar
Chief Executive Officer
Téliphone Navigata-Westel Communications Inc.
338 Saint-Antoine Est, #101
Montréal, Québec  H2Y 1A3

Mr. James Owen Gilbert
President and Chief Strategy Officer
Téliphone Navigata-Westel Communications Inc.
1210-200 Granville Street
Vancouver, British Columbia  V6C 1S4

Mr. Stephen Schmidt
Vice-President - Telecom Policy & Chief Regulatory Legal Counsel
Telecom Policy and Regulatory Affairs
TELUS Communications Company
215 Slater Street, 8th floor
Ottawa, Ontario  K1P 0A6

Subject:  Possible ## between Téliphone Navigata-Westel Communications Inc. (TNW) and TELUS Communications Company (TCC) and Part 1 Application by TNW

Dear Sirs:

On 31 August 2016, TNW filed with the Commission a Part 1 application, requesting that the Commission provide TNW with 180 days to ## by TCC, as well as 90 days following ##.

On 2 September 2016, Commission staff advised parties that since the Part 1 application would have to be addressed by the Commission as soon as possible due to ##, TCC was to submit its answer by 12 September 2016, while TNW may file its reply comments by 13 September 2016.

On 13 September 2016, TNW filed a letter with the Commission indicating that it had determined that considerable time and resources would be required to adequately respond to TCC’s answers.  Due to travel schedules and availability, TNW did not believe that it could file its reply comments by 13 September 2016.  Accordingly, TNW requested a 24-hour extension to file its reply comments.

Commission staff notes that the requested extension is reasonable.  Accordingly, TNW is to file its reply comments by 14 September 2016.

All submissions are to be served on the other party no later than when they are filed with the Commission. Also, please be reminded that when filing a document in confidence, an abridged version of the same must also be filed at the same time.


Original signed by

Michel Murray
Director, Dispute Resolution and Regulatory Implementation
Telecommunications Sector
c.c.:  Eric Unrau, TNW,
Danny Moreau, CRTC,

##: Denotes confidential information

Date modified: