ARCHIVED - Telecom Procedural Letter Addressed to Distribution List
This page has been archived on the Web
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. Archived Decisions, Notices and Orders (DNOs) remain in effect except to the extent they are amended or reversed by the Commission, a court, or the government. The text of archived information has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Changes to DNOs are published as “dashes” to the original DNO number. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us.
Ottawa, 26 April 2016
Our reference: 8663-C12-201503186
BY EMAIL
Distribution
Re: Review of basic telecommunications services, Telecom Notice of Consultation 2015-134Footnote 1 – Requests for information
As part of the above-noted proceeding, the Commission is examining the availability of satellite services, including the feasibility of using Ka- and Ku-band satellites for backhaul networks.
Attached are requests for information for which responses are to be filed by 5 May 2016. This submission must be received, not merely sent, by that date.
Sincerely,
Original signed by
John Macri
Director, Policy Framework
Telecommunications Sector
c.c.: Christine Bailey, CRTC, (819) 997-4557, christine.bailey@crtc.gc.ca
Sarah O’Brien, CRTC, (819) 635-3217, sarah.obrien@crtc.gc.ca
Attach. (1)
Distribution List
- Bell Canada, bell.regulatory@bell.ca
- MTS, iworkstation@mtsallstream.com
- SaskTel, document.control@sasktel.sk.ca
- Telus Communications Company, regulatory.affairs@telus.com
- SSi Micro Ltd., regulatory@ssimicro.com
- Kativik Regional Government, jdumoulin@krg.ca
- Kukenah Network (K-Net) c/o First Mile Connectivity Consortium, rdmcmaho@ualberta.ca
ATTACHMENT
Requests for information
- Would it be technically and economically feasible to upgrade the company’s ground stations so that they are compatible with Ka- or Ku-band service? If so, list all activities that would need to be undertaken to complete such an upgrade, including any measures required to mitigate against rain fade or other issues as compared to the C-band. If not, assuming C-band would continue to be used to deliver voice services, what infrastructure (e.g. community ground station, gateway ground station) would be required to deliver service on a community aggregator model using HTS technology? Provide a diagram showing all major infrastructure components required.
- Does the company have any plans to use high throughput satellite (HTS) technology in order to extend its network and meet or exceed 5 megabits per second (Mbps) download and 1 Mbps upload target speeds in satellite dependent communities? If so, provide the details of those plans. If the company plans to use HTS technology and direct-to-home service, would the company still continue to provide voice and Internet services using the community aggregator model? If not, elaborate on how the company would plan to provide voice services.
Footnotes
- Footnote 1
-
Review of basic telecommunications services, Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2015-134, 9 April 2015, as amended by Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2015-134-1, 3 June 2015; Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2015-134-2, 22 December 2015; and Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2015-134-3, 14 January 2016, Telecom Notice of Consultation 2015-134-4, 9 March 2016.
- Date modified: