ARCHIVED - Telecom Commission Letter addressed to Jean-Francois Mathieu (La Cie de Téléphone de Upton Inc.)
This page has been archived on the Web
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. Archived Decisions, Notices and Orders (DNOs) remain in effect except to the extent they are amended or reversed by the Commission, a court, or the government. The text of archived information has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Changes to DNOs are published as “dashes” to the original DNO number. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us.
Ottawa, 27 July 2015
Our reference: 8740-U2-201506536
BY E-MAIL
Mr. Jean-Francois Mathieu
Director General
La Compagnie de Téléphone Upton Inc.
j-fmathieu@telupton.qc.ca
RE: Designation of confidential cost information filed in cost studies supporting revised direct connect service rates
On 22 June 2015, La Compagnie de Téléphone Upton Inc. (Upton) filed for Commission approval tariff pages for direct connect (DC) service in which the proposed rate is supported by a cost study. Certain information was provided to the Commission in confidence pursuant to section 39 of the Telecommunications Act.
The Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission Rules of Practice and Procedure (the Rules of Procedure) address the filing by parties of information in confidence on the record of a public proceeding. Specifically, section 32 of the Rules of Procedure states that, when a party designates information as confidential:
(1) The party that designates information as confidential must provide reasons, as well as any supporting documents, why the disclosure of the information would not be in the public interest, including why the specific direct harm that would be likely to result from the disclosure would outweigh the public interest; and
(2) The party must either file with the Commission an abridged version, intended to be made available to the public, of the document that contains the information or provide reasons, as well as any supporting documents, why an abridged version cannot be filed.
Upton did not include an abridged version of Tables 1-5 of its cost study in its filing on 22 June 2015. Accordingly, Upton is requested to provide an abridged version of Tables 1-5 of its cost study, or provide reasons why an abridged version of these tables cannot be filed.
The Commission provided directions on what cost information should be disclosed in cost studies filed in support of tariff filings in Broadcasting and Telecom Information Bulletin CRTC 2010-961, Procedures for filing confidential information and requesting its disclosure in Commission proceedings, 23 December 2010. The Appendix to this decision was subsequently amended by Telecom Information Bulletin CRTC 2010-961-1 to reflect additional directives provided in Telecom Regulatory Policy CRTC 2012-592, Confidentiality of information used to establish wholesale service rates, 26 October 2012. Upton must ensure that abridged documents disclose all cost information that should be public, or provide reasons why any cost information should not be disclosed.
Upton is to file with the Commission all information to be provided pursuant to this letter by 3 August 2015.
Yours sincerely
Original signed by
Lyne Renaud
Director
Competitor Services and Costing Implementation
Telecommunications Sector
cc: matthew.alexander@crtc.gc.ca
martin.brazeau@crtc.gc.ca
gregory.milosek@crtc.gc.ca
- Date modified: