ARCHIVED - Telecom Procedural Letter Addressed to Louise Bégin (Sogetel Inc.)
This page has been archived on the Web
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. Archived Decisions, Notices and Orders (DNOs) remain in effect except to the extent they are amended or reversed by the Commission, a court, or the government. The text of archived information has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Changes to DNOs are published as “dashes” to the original DNO number. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us.
Ottawa, 30 April 2015
Our reference: 8740-S4-201503509
BY EMAIL
Ms. Louise Bégin
Legal Counsel
Sogetel Inc.
111 12-Novembre Street
Nicolet, QC J3T 1S3
louise.begin@sogetel.com
Re: Tariff Notice 173 – Tariff amendments
Dear Madam:
On 16 April 2015, the Commission received the above-mentioned tariff notice submitted by Sogetel Inc. (Sogetel), in which the company proposed to correct clerical errors in its General Tariff and further clarify certain sections of the Tariff to facilitate consultation. The company indicated that its application qualified as a Group A retail filing pursuant to Telecom Information Bulletin CRTC 2010-455 – Approval processes for tariff applications and intercarrier agreements, as amended from time to time (Information Bulletin 2010-455), dated 5 July 2010.
Commission staff considers that the application does not meet the definition of Group A retail tariff filings set out in Information Bulletin 2010-455. In particular, it does not meet the criteria for housekeeping changes, since the changes amend the conditions of the tariff in question.
For purposes of efficiency, the Commission will process this application as a Group B retail tariff filing rather than close the file and require the company to re-file it as a new application. However, this application, along with all associated subsequent revisions, will not be approved on an interim basis on the 15th calendar day following receipt. The Commission intends to dispose of this application, along with any subsequent revisions, within 45 business days following receipt.
The company is not to implement its proposed tariff revisions until the application is approved.
Sincerely,
Original signed by
Michel Murray
Director, Dispute Resolution and Regulatory Implementation
Telecommunications Sector
c.c.: Jean-François Roof, CRTC, 819-639-2537, jean-francois.roof@crtc.gc.ca
- Date modified: