ARCHIVED - Broadcasting Commission Letter addressed to Ron Lund (Association of Canadian Advertisers)
This page has been archived on the Web
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. Archived Decisions, Notices and Orders (DNOs) remain in effect except to the extent they are amended or reversed by the Commission, a court, or the government. The text of archived information has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Changes to DNOs are published as “dashes” to the original DNO number. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us.
Ottawa, 25 March 2015
Our Reference: 697523
By email
Ron Lund
President & CEO
Association of Canadian Advertisers
rlund@acaweb.ca
Re: Simultaneous substitution decision
Dear Mr. Lund,
This is in response to your correspondence of 17 February 2015, wherein you indicated your disagreement with the Commission's decision with regard to simultaneous substitution during the Super Bowl and on specialty channels. You requested a meeting with the Chair to discuss your views on this decision.
I note that the decision in question was reached following an extensive public proceeding that examined many options with respect to simultaneous substitution including its elimination during live events or its complete elimination. The Commission heard from many stakeholders including advertisers, who are an important component of, and contributor to, the broadcasting system.
The Commission did hear testimony during the proceeding regarding the value and importance of simultaneous substitution to broadcasting undertakings, program producers and actors, and advertisers. For the most part, the Commission followed your recommendations to maintain the simultaneous substitution regime, despite it being a major exception to the fundamental rule that broadcasting distribution undertakings, as common carriers, should not alter the content of a programming service.
It also heard, however, many Canadians express their frustrations triggered by improperly executed substitutions that caused them to miss portions of programs. The broadcasters acknowledged these difficulties and indicated a willingness to address these issues by way of a working group. Canadians also complained of missing the American ads during the Super Bowl, which they consider to be an integral part of the event.
I note that in a study submitted by Armstrong Consulting for the Let’s Talk TV proceeding entitled, The Economic Value of Simultaneous Signal Substitution for English-Language Private Television Broadcasters, it is estimated that for the 2012/2013 broadcasting year, simultaneous substitution accounted for 9.7 million average weekly viewing hours. Therefore, the Super Bowl, which is 3 hours long, represents an extremely small fraction of the total amount of opportunities for advertising on television in Canada.
While the Super Bowl, in your view, may be one of the more valuable advertising opportunities, our analysis of the 2014 Super Bowl commercials indicates that only 71.5% of the available advertising minutes were purchased for that purpose. Further, while simultaneous substitution of the Super Bowl will no longer be permitted as of 2017, advertising opportunities will continue to exist for Canadian advertisers on the Super Bowl where a Canadian television station broadcasts the event. One hundred percent of the ads on Canadian networks will continue to be ads sold by the Canadian network. If your client’s advertising is of world class, there is no doubt that Canadians will tune to the Canadian broadcast of the event.
Moreover, as the total number of substituted viewing hours suggest, there will continue to be numerous opportunities for advertising on programming and popular live events such as the CFL Grey Cup, NHL playoffs and various awards shows. In this light, the elimination of simultaneous substitution for one event is unlikely to significantly affect advertisers in Canada.
Competition for consumers’ viewing attention in an age of abundance is not just a reality for content producers, but also for advertisers.
The Commission considered all of the evidence and submissions put before it, in the public proceeding mentioned above. The decisions taken represent a balanced approach to addressing all issues and views presented.
Because the implementation of this decision is still before the Commission and the Commission has not yet issued its decisions on the many other outstanding issues from the public proceeding, it would be inappropriate and unfair to other interveners for you to hold private meetings with the Chair either individually or collectively to discuss your views on this decision.
Sincerely,
Original signed by
Scott Hutton
Executive director, Broadcasting
- Date modified: