ARCHIVED - Telecom Commission Letter addressed to Louise Bégin (La Cie de Téléphone de Courcelles inc.)

This page has been archived on the Web

Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. Archived Decisions, Notices and Orders (DNOs) remain in effect except to the extent they are amended or reversed by the Commission, a court, or the government. The text of archived information has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Changes to DNOs are published as “dashes” to the original DNO number. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us.

Ottawa, 29 September 2014                                                   

Our reference: 8740-C4-201409714           

BY EMAIL

Ms. Louise Bégin
Legal Counsel
La Cie de Téléphone de Courcelles inc.
101 Champlain Avenue, PO Box 10
Courcelles, Quebec  G0M 1C0
louise.begin@sogetel.com

Re: Tariff Notice #43 – Amendment to section 5.2 of the General Tariff

Dear Ms. Bégin:

On 24 September 2014, the Commission received the above-mentioned tariff notice submitted by La Cie de Téléphone de Courcelles inc. (CRC) in which the company proposed, among other things, to amend section 5.2 of its general tariff to comply with Telecom Decision CRTC 2014-77. The company submitted that its application was a Group B retail tariff filing under Approval processes for tariff applications and intercarrier agreements, Telecom Information Bulletin CRTC 2010-455, 5 July 2010, as amended from time to time (Information Bulletin 2010-455).

Commission staff considers this application not to meet the definition of a Group B retail tariff filing as indicated in Information Bulletin 2010-455 because it does not deal with services provided to retail customers, but with services that would be provided only to competitors. For purposes of efficiency, the Commission will process this application as a Competitor tariff filing rather than close the file and require the company to re-file it as a new application.

Accordingly, the application will follow the procedures described in Information Bulletin 2010-455 for Competitor tariffs:

The company is therefore not to implement its proposed tariff until a Commission order is issued disposing of this application.

Sincerely,

Original signed by

Michel Murray, Director
Regulatory Implementation
Telecommunications Sector

c.c.: Jocelyne Patry, CTC, jpatry@telcourcelles.qc.ca
Jean-François Roof, CRTC, 819-639-2537, jean-françois.roof@crtc.gc.ca

Date modified: