ARCHIVED - Telecom Commission Letter Addressed to Michel Gilbert (Télébec, Limited Partnership)

This page has been archived on the Web

Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. Archived Decisions, Notices and Orders (DNOs) remain in effect except to the extent they are amended or reversed by the Commission, a court, or the government. The text of archived information has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Changes to DNOs are published as “dashes” to the original DNO number. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us.

Ottawa, 18 September 2014

Our references: 8740-T78-201408873 and 8740-T78-201408907

BY EMAIL

Mr. Michel Gilbert
Director – Regulatory Affairs
Télébec, Limited Partnership
87 Ontario Street West, 5th Floor
Montreal, Quebec  H2X 1Y8
mgilbert@telebec.com

Re:  Tariff Notice 474 and Tariff Notice 475

Dear Sir:

On 2 September 2014, the Commission received an application by Télébec, Limited Partnership (Télébec or the company), under cover of Tariff Notice 474 and 475, in which the company proposed revisions to section 2.1.7 of its General Tariff – Monthly Rates for Access Lines, Regional Surcharges, and Other Fees.

The company indicated that, together with Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada, it had filed a Part 1 application on the same date, in which it had proposed to reverse certain limited-term exogenous adjustments that had been approved by the Commission but had since expired.

Télébec stated that its tariff applications and other measures set out in the Part 1 application would bring its prices in line with service rate band limits.

Commission staff notes that the disposal of the tariff applications will depend on the disposal of the Part 1 application.

Consequently, these applications, along with all associated subsequent revisions, may not be approved on an interim basis on the 15th calendar day following receipt. However, the Commission intends to dispose of these applications, along with all associated subsequent revisions, together with the Part 1 application.

Sincerely,

Original signed by

Michel Murray
Director, Regulatory Implementation
Telecommunications Sector

c. c.: Joseph Cabrera, CRTC, 819-934-6352, joseph.cabrera@crtc.gc.ca

Date modified: