ARCHIVED - Letter

This page has been archived on the Web

Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. Archived Decisions, Notices and Orders (DNOs) remain in effect except to the extent they are amended or reversed by the Commission, a court, or the government. The text of archived information has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Changes to DNOs are published as “dashes” to the original DNO number. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us.

Ottawa, 2 June 2014

Our reference:  8663-C12-201401041

BY EMAIL

Distribution

RE: Appointment of an Inquiry Officer to review matters related to transport services provided by satellite – Requests for information

Dear Madam, Sir:

In Telecom Notice of Consultation 2014-44 [1], the Commission announced that Commissioner Candice Molnar will conduct an inquiry with respect to the Canadian marketplace for satellite services that are used by telecommunications service providers (TSPs) to provide telecommunications services to Canadians.

As part of the inquiry process, the Inquiry Officer is seeking information regarding satellite and related services, from various stakeholders involved in providing telecommunications services in remote areas in Canada. Accordingly, various requests for information are included as an attachment to this letter.

All parties identified in the distribution list below are to file responses to the requests for information set out in Section 1. Earth station operators are to file responses to the requests for information set out in Section 2. Satellite operators are to file responses to the requests for information set out in Section 3. Providers of telecommunications services (excluding satellite operators), such as TSPs, are to file responses to the requests for information set out in Section 4. Governments or government organizations are to file responses to the requests for information set out in Section 5.

Interested persons that have information responsive to the requests for information set out in Sections 1-5, but that are not currently parties to the inquiry, are also encouraged to provide responses to the Inquiry Officer.

As set out in Telecom Notice of Consultation 2014-44-1, issued today, all responses are to be filed with the Inquiry Officer by 23 June 2014. These responses are to be received, and not merely sent, by this date.

Yours sincerely,

Original signed by

Candice Molnar
Inquiry Officer
Commissioner, Manitoba and Saskatchewan


Distribution List

109W Satellite Communications Inc., bolsen@sympatico.ca  
Arctic Fibre Inc., doug@arcticfibre.com  
Bell Aliant, regulatory@bell.aliant.ca  
Bell Mobility, bell.regulatory@bell.ca  
Canadian Cable System Alliance Inc., cedwards@ccsa.cable.ca  
Christopher Mitchelmore, cmitchelmore@gov.nl.ca  
Ciel Satellite Group, scott.gibson@cielsatellite.ca  
Echostar Satellite Services, jennifer.manner@echostar.com  
Eeyou Communications Network, aloon@gcc.ca  
Government of Nunavut, regulatory.affairs@gov.nu.ca  
Government of the Northwest Territories, linda_maljan@gov.nt.ca  
Government of Yukon, benjamin.sanders@gov.yk.ca  
Heather Hudson, heatherehudson@gmail.com  
Hispasat S.A., vrubio@hispasat.es  
HughesNet, steve.doiron@hughes.com   
Hunter Communications Canada, brent.perrott@huntercomm.net  
Ice Wireless, regulatory@icewireless.ca
Intelsat S.A., gonzalo.dedios@intelsat.com  
Iristel, regulatory@iristel.com
Isuma Distribution International Ltd., zkunnuk@isuma.ca  
JSAT International Inc., info@jsati.com  
Juch-Tech Inc., juchniewicz@juch-tech.com  
Keewaytinook Okimakanak (K-Net), danpellerin@knet.ca   
Lynx Mobility Inc., aahmed@lynxmobility.com  
MTS Allstream, iworkstation@mtsallstream.com  
Northern Indigenous Community Satellite Network, jdumoulin@krg.ca and sramchandar@gobcn.ca   
Northwestel Inc., regulatoryaffairs@nwtel.ca  
Nunavut Broadband Development Corporation, oana@nunavut-broadband.ca  
Omnispace LLC, jbravman@omni-sat.com  
Province of British Columbia, roman.mateyko@gov.bc.ca  
Public Interest Advocacy Centre, piac@piac.ca  
Rob McMahon, rob.mcmahon@unb.ca  
Saskatchewan Telecommunications, document.control@sasktel.com
SES S.A., suzanne.malloy@ses.com  
SSi Group of Companies, regulatory@ssimicro.com  
Telesat, iscott@telesat.com  
TELUS Communications Company, regulatory.affairs@telus.com  
Town of Roddickton-Bide Arm, roddickton@nf.aibn.com  
Viasat Inc., daryl.hunter@viasat.com  
Xplornet Communications Inc., cj.prudham@corp.xplornet.com 
O.N.Tel Inc. operating as Ontera, tracy.cant@ontera.ca

BY CANADA POST
Linda Randell, P.O. Box 375, Bide Arm NL, A0K 1J0
Marlene Randell, P.O. Box 371, Roddickton-Bide Arm NL, A0K 4P0


Section 1: requests for information directed at all parties

Competition

1.1 Telecom Notice of Consultation 2014-44 stated that the inquiry and report will focus, among other things, on potential changes to the competitive environment. The first step of assessing the competitive environment in any market is to define the relevant market. Comment on the following proposed definition of the market being examined in this inquiry:

Fixed-satellite services (FSS) used by providers of telecommunications services in the transport section of their networks that enable the provisioning of telecommunications services, such as broadband Internet, voice, and wireless (both fixed and mobile), to end-users in Canada.[2]

In your response, address whether the definition should consider:

  1. customers located north of the 60th parallel north as a sub- or separate market from those located south of the 60th parallel north;
  2. different frequency bands that deliver telecommunications services (i.e. C-band, Ka-band, Ku-band) as being separate product markets, and
  3. future satellite technologies, such as high throughput satellites, as being part of a different market.

1.2 Having regard to the relevant market defined in 1.1 above,

  1. What characteristics would indicate, in your view, that the market is competitive, in terms of market share, demand and supply conditions, the likelihood of competitor entry, barriers to entry, and rivalrous behavior?
  2. Are there any other factors that should be considered when assessing the competitiveness or other characteristics of the relevant market?

1.3 Discuss how feasible it is for a provider of telecommunications services to switch from one FSS provider to another. Provide a high-level explanation of the process and costs involved when a provider of telecommunications services switches from one FSS provider to another.  For those who purchase FSS, have you been approached or considered changing FSS providers, and if so, what was the end result (e.g. initial meetings only, service contract proposal, switched FSS providers, etc.)

Subsidies

1.4 Describe any public subsidies or funding (in terms of the amount, purpose of the funding, and any obligations associated with the subsidy) that you currently receive in connection with the provision or purchase of FSS, and when each of those sources of funding is expected to expire.

1.5 Describe any sources of public subsidies or funding connected with the provision or purchase of FSS  that are anticipated in the near future.

Relevant Literature

1.6 As announced in Telecom Notice of Consultation 2014-44, the Inquiry Officer is conducting her review, in part, through a review of relevant literature. Literature that has been referred to as part of the satellite inquiry is set out in Appendix A. Identify any additional relevant literature that you are aware of that would be useful for the Inquiry Officer to consult.  

Communities

1.7 A list of communities that are believed to receive telecommunications services (e.g. voice, wireless (both fixed and mobile), Internet) by way of FSS is set out in Appendix B. Having regard to that list, identify:

  1. Any communities that receive telecommunications services by way of FSS that are not included in the list.[3]
  2. Any communities from the list that do not, in fact, receive telecommunications services by way of FSS.
  3. Which communities receive telecommunications services by more than one satellite?

Section 2: requests for information directed at earth station operators

An earth station (also named ground station or satellite terrestrial station) is a ground-based receiving or transmitting /receiving station in a satellite communications system. The counterpart to the earth station is the space segment, which is the satellite in orbit, which is the "space station." Earth stations use dish-shaped antennas.

Technical performance

2.1 For each earth station you operate, identify the total FSS capacity allocated to each earth station, in terms of megabits per second (Mbps). Provide the response for: (i) the highest-cost, lowest-cost, and an average-cost community, in your serving area, located north of the 60th parallel north, and (ii) the highest-cost, lowest-cost, and an average-cost community, in your serving area, located south of the 60th parallel north.

  1. If more than one community shares the same earth station's capacity, indicate the capacity made available to each community.

2.2 Can the earth station(s) you operate technologically support the provision of retail Internet service at the target speeds established by the Commission in Telecom Regulatory Policy 2011-291 (i.e. 5 Mbps download and 1 Mbps upload)?

  1. If so, describe the methodology used to meet the Commission's target speeds (e.g. the amount of satellite capacity, the oversubscription ratio used, etc.) and provide information on the quality of service (e.g. feedback you receive from consumers, etc.)
  2. If not, describe the reasons why the Commission's target speeds cannot be met. Identify whether the bottleneck is due to issues with the space segment or with ground infrastructure. Indicate what speeds you currently offer.

2.3 Describe any existing technical challenges (e.g. technical limitations) related to satellite earth station technology, including particularly, the impact of those challenges on the quality and capacity of transmitted / received signals (e.g. speed, bandwidth, latency, etc.)

Efficiencies

As noted in Telecom Notice of Consultation 2014-44, the satellite inquiry is exploring technical limitations on satellite services and potential changes to technology, in that technical solutions may be able to be implemented as a means of improving efficiencies. For instance, some earth stations can operate in one band (e.g. C–band), while others can operate in dual bands (e.g. C-band and Ku-band with a 7.3M Earth Station Antenna).  

The following series of questions relates to the earth stations that you operate.

2.4 How many frequency bands can be operated at the same time by the same earth station?

  1. Describe the advantages and disadvantages of utilizing more than one frequency band on the same earth station.

A variety of forms of antennas can be used for transmitting to and receiving from satellites. The most common type of satellite antenna is the parabolic reflector (dish), however this is not the only type of antenna that can be used. The actual type of antenna will depend upon the overall application and the requirements.

Ground antennas used for receiving satellite signals and transmitting to the satellites vary considerably according to their application. Again, parabolic reflectors (dish) are the most widely used, but Yagi antennas may be used on occasion. The size of the antennas may vary considerably. The parabolic reflectors used for satellite television reception are very small. However those used for professional applications are much larger and may range up to several tens of meters in size.

2.5 Some earth stations can contain 1 or 2 antennas (dishes) and others can contain more than 2 antennas, including redundant antennas. For your earth stations, is operating an earth station with multiple antennas (dishes) more cost effective than operating an earth station with a single antenna?  If so, please explain how it is more cost effective.

2.6 Presently, do you have any existing collocation arrangements or plans for such arrangements with other providers of telecommunications services on the same earth station?

  1. If so, please describe your actual collocation arrangements and/or plans.
  2. If not, please explain why not and indicate if you have any future plans to collocate with other providers of telecommunications services.

2.7 Describe the potential changes related to new satellite technologies and to earth station technology, along with the impact(s) on earth station performance and cost.


Section 3: requests for information directed at satellite operators

Space Segment

3.1 Based on the latest technology available in the marketplace, what is the maximum achievable speed in Mbps from a satellite transponder, by frequency band? What is the typical speed in Mbps achieved in a satellite transponder? Include assumptions and calculations in your response.

3.2 Describe how a provider of telecommunications services shares its' total FSS capacity between the communities it serves.

3.3 Provide estimated end-of-life dates for satellites that provide service to providers of telecommunications services (e.g. voice, wireless (both fixed and mobile), Internet, data) in Canada. Describe changes to FSS capacity as a satellite nears end-of-life.

3.4 Does current satellite technology limit the speeds and reliability of telecommunications services that providers of telecommunications services can offer in satellite-served communities? If so, provide a list of services offered by service providers, and/or applications that use those services, that are limited by satellite technology, and describe how satellite technology limits these services and/or applications (e.g. bandwidth, usage caps, latency, etc.).

3.5 Are there satellite frequency bands that are better suited for certain telecommunications services than others; especially when considering the prospects for high throughput satellite technology and propagation impairments in the different frequency bands?

3.6 Provide your plans to deploy new or replacement satellites which would provide coverage of Canada, including the North. Indicate whether coverage of Canada is anticipated for any or all of the frequency bands supported by the satellite, and whether satellite capacity has been presold to Canadian providers of telecommunications services who offer service in Canada. In the case of a replacement satellite, explain the plans to retain the orbital position and spectrum. Describe what impact these new or replacement satellites and associated technologies will have on the telecommunications services that can be delivered by providers of telecommunications services to end-users. Provide expected changes to pricing (e.g. offer sheet) to purchasers of FSS as a result of the introduction of new satellites.

FSS Rates

3.7 Describe the factors considered by your company in establishing rates for FSS and explain how the pricing of FSS responds to those factors.

3.8 Are the FSS rates your company charges to Canadian providers of telecommunications services different from the rates your company charges to providers of telecommunications services outside of Canada? If so, describe how and why they are different.

3.9 Describe, in general terms, how FSS rates are expected to change in the future.

3.10 At your existing rates, comment on whether your supply of C-band FSS capacity exceeds demand. If supply exceeds demand, comment on any measures that satellite operators could implement to stimulate demand for this unused capacity, including the feasibility of lowering C-band rates in order to stimulate demand.

  1. Comment on how the price of C-band FSS capacity would be affected by a simultaneous increase in demand for C-band FSS capacity and a reduction of excess C-band FSS capacity. 
  2. If there is unused capacity, explain why this capacity should continue to remain unused.

Efficiencies

3.11 Describe any steps undertaken by your company in recent years to reduce the costs or maximize the efficiency of FSS, explaining the extent of the efficiency improvement or capacity improvement that has occurred.

3.12 Describe how your company intends to reduce the costs or maximize the efficiency of FSS in the future. For each improvement identified, explain:

  1. If and when the improvement will be implemented by the company.
  2. The expected effect of this improvement on your FSS costs and capacity.

3.13 Discuss how providers of telecommunications services could reduce the costs or maximize the efficiency of providing telecommunications services by way of FSS in the future. If applicable, discuss cost savings and efficiencies that could arise from the sharing of ground infrastructure, improved provisioning of voice services by way of FSS, or the use of more efficient electronic equipment and ground station technology.


Section 4: requests for information directed at providers of telecommunications services (e.g. voice, wireless, Internet, data services) excluding satellite operators

Mapping data

4.1 A list of communities that are thought to receive telecommunications services through FSS transport services is set out in Appendix B. For each community identified in Appendix B, including any amendments to that list proposed as part of your response above, provide:

  1. Its population, latitude, and longitude.
  2. The number of households, businesses and government offices (e.g. schools, health clinics, government offices), as well as total population, that have access to your telecommunications services.
  3. The telecommunications services that you deliver.
  4. Details on plans offered in communities for residential and business consumers, including price, speeds, data caps and overage charges for broadband Internet access and rates for retail voice services.
  5. The number of end-users you have, by telecommunications service (e.g. voice, wireless (separately for fixed and mobile), Internet, data).
  6. The ratio (%) of traffic for business versus residential and across telecommunications services (voice, wireless (separately for fixed and mobile), data, Internet).
  7. The FSS capacity used to serve each community in terms of: (i) transponders, (ii) bandwidth in MHz, and (iii) Megabits per second (Mbps). If transponders are shared amongst multiple communities, then provide the capacity required to serve a group of communities and provide a list of communities in each group.
  8. Whether you provide broadband Internet access services at the Commission's target speeds of 5 Mbps download and 1 Mbps upload.
    1.  If so, indicate the total number of Internet subscribers that receive Internet services at or above the Commission's target speeds.
  9. If you do not provide an Internet service plan that meets the Commission's target speeds of 5 Mbps download and 1 Mbps upload as a result of technical limitations of satellite technology, identify the FSS capacity that would be required to offer such a plan, in terms of: (i) transponders, (ii) bandwidth in MHz, and (iii) Mbps.

4.2 Provide a list of communities included in planned service expansions where FSS would be used in the delivery of telecommunication services. For each of these communities, provide:

  1. Its population, latitude, and longitude.
  2. The number of households, businesses and government offices (e.g. schools, health clinics, government offices), as well as total population that have access to your telecommunications services.
  3. The planned FSS capacity used to serve each community in terms of: (i) transponders, (ii) bandwidth in MHz, and (iii) Mbps. If transponders are shared amongst multiple communities, then provide the proposed capacity required to serve a group of communities and provide a list of communities in each group.

4.3 If you do not provide broadband Internet access services at the Commission's target speeds established in Telecom Regulatory Policy CRTC 2011-291 (5 Mbps download and 1 Mbps upload) or can only provide such access to a limited number of subscribers, explain what role FSS play in limiting deployment of Internet access at the Commission's target speeds.

4.4 Evolution of satellite technology has led to broadband Internet access delivered directly to the end user (direct-to-home) using Ka-band spot beam technology or Ka-band high-throughput satellite spot beam technology. In order to better understand the substitutability of direct-to-home service delivery for the delivery of telecommunications services using FSS transport services, please respond to the following:

  1. Are all communities served by FSS satellite transport (Appendix B) covered by satellites that have spot beam technology? If not which communities, presently served by FSS satellite transport, are not covered.
  2. What telecommunications services are delivered using direct-to-home satellite technology? For Internet access services, specify whether the Commission's target speeds of 5 Mbps download and 1 Mbps upload can be met with direct-to-home technology. What are those services that cannot be delivered using direct-to-home satellite technology?
  3. Is the use of direct-to-home technology more efficient in delivering telecommunications services, including broadband Internet access, than FSS satellite transport technology? Explain.

Efficiencies

4.5 Describe any steps undertaken by your company in recent years to reduce the costs or maximize the efficiency of providing telecommunications services by way of FSS, including any steps taken to share facilities with other providers of telecommunications services.

Discuss how your company intends to reduce the costs or maximize the efficiency of providing telecommunications services by way of FSS in the future. If applicable, discuss cost savings or efficiencies that could arise from the sharing of ground infrastructure, improved provisioning of voice services by way of FSS, or the use of more efficient electronic equipment and ground station technology. For each efficiency identified, explain:

  1. If and when the efficiency will be implemented by the company.  
  2. The effect of this efficiency, in terms of costs and capacity, on the telecommunications services you provide by way of FSS. If there are effective limitations on the implementation of an efficiency (e.g., maximum latitude or minimum community size), then identify and explain the limitations.

4.7 Discuss how providers of FSS could, in the future, reduce the costs or maximize the efficiency of FSS. For each improvement identified, explain the likely effect on the telecommunication services offered to your subscribers. In addition and if applicable, comment on the feasibility and expected effects of peering and caching.

4.8 Does current satellite technology limit the speeds and reliability of telecommunications services that you provide by way of FSS? If so, provide a list of the telecommunications services you offer that are limited by satellite technology, and describe how satellite technology limits these services.

4.9 If applicable, explain how you have segregated your use of satellite transponders between voice and broadband Internet services. Comment on whether or not separate voice and broadband/data networks are an efficient method of providing telecommunications services to end-users by way of FSS.

4.10 If you operate more than one network in a single service area, indicate whether or not the FSS capacity for these networks is pooled. If the FSS capacity for these networks is not pooled, explain why and discuss what additional efficiencies could be realized if all capacity in a given service area were pooled.

4.11 If you operate more than one network in a single service area, and do not pool FSS capacity for these networks, identify:

  1. Each separate network that you operate in the single service area.
  2. The total FSS capacity that is allocated to each network.
  3. The traffic volume (in Kbps, Mbps, or Gbps) during the peak hour for each network.
  4. The time(s) of day that the network reaches its peak traffic. 

TSP's average costs of delivering 1 Mbps of capacity by way of FSS

4.12 Provide a high-level description of the network configuration you use to provide telecommunications services by way of FSS, from the gateway earth stations up to, but not including, the distribution network in the community.

  1. Describe the extent to which you rely on FSS to provide telecommunications services.

4.13 Refer to the tab titled "Expense Information" on the attached spreadsheet.

  1. In terms of delivering 1 Mbps of capacity to a community by way of FSS, identify the highest-cost, lowest-cost, and an average-cost community located north of the 60th parallel north that you deliver telecommunications services to by way of FSS. Further, identify the highest-cost, lowest-cost, and an average-cost community located south of the 60th parallel north that you deliver telecommunications services to by way of FSS.
  2. Complete the table by providing the average cost of delivering 1 Mbps of capacity by way of FSS to each of the six communities identified in a) above. You may also provide the average cost of delivering 1 Mbps of capacity by way of FSS for any other community of your choosing. For each expense identified, provide the following:
    1. A description of the items included in the expense line.
    2. The methodology and assumptions used to determine the expense.
    3. If applicable, explain the factors that cause differences in expenses between satellite dependent communities located north of the 60th parallel north and those communities located south of the 60th parallel north.

Section 5: requests for information directed at government organizations

5.1 A list of communities that are thought to receive telecommunications services through FSS is set out in Appendix B. For each community identified in Appendix B, including any proposed amendments to that list, provide:

  1. Its population and number of households, number of businesses and government users for these communities.

5.2 Provide the names of the TSPs serving each satellite served community.

5.3 What capacity is used by government users (e.g. schools, health clinics, government offices)?

  1. As a whole?
  2. Per community?

5.4 Identify whether government users in these communities have a dedicated FSS link to a government-operated earth station, or whether they rely on a provider of telecommunications services for the provisioning of telecommunications services.


Appendix A

Relevant Literature

Broadband via Satellite, Canada Connects on Broadband, n.d. <http://www.canadaconnects.ca/broadband/main/1113/>

Satellite Communications & Broadcasting Markets Survey: Forecasts to 2022, Euroconsult, 1 September 2013
<http://www.euroconsult-ec.com/shop/satellite-communications/43-ws2-2.html>

Annual Report and Analysis of Competitive Market Conditions with Respect to Domestic  and International Satellite Communications Services, Federal Communications Commission, 26 March 2007
<http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-34A1.pdf>

Second Annual Report and Analysis of Competitive Market Conditions with Respect to Domestic and International Satellite Communications Services, Federal Communications Commission, 16 October 2008 <http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-247A1.pdf>

Third Report and Analysis of Competitive Market Conditions with Respect to Domestic and International Satellite Communications Services, Federal Communications Commission, 13 December 2011
<http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-183A1.pdf>

2013 Futron Forecast of Global Satellite Services Demand, Futron Corporation, 12 December 2013
<http://www.futron.com/2013_Futron_Forecast.xml>

Decisions on the Licensing Framework for Fixed-Satellite Service (FSS) and Broadcasting-Satellite Service (BSS), Implications for Other Satellite Services in Canada, and Revised Fee Proposal, Industry Canada, 5 November 2013
<http://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/smt-gst.nsf/eng/sf10602.html>

RP-008 - Policy Framework for Fixed-Satellite Service (FSS) and Broadcasting-Satellite Service (BSS), Industry Canada, 21 November 2013
<http://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/smt-gst.nsf/eng/sf01693.html>

List of Satellites Approved to Provide Fixed-satellite Services (FSS) in Canada, Industry Canada, 6 March 2014
<http://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/smt-gst.nsf/eng/sf02104.html>

A Practical Introductory Guide on Using Satellite Technology for Communications, Intelsat, n.d. <http://www.intelsat.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/5941-SatellitePrimer-2010.pdf>

National C-Band Public Benefit Working Group, K-Net, n.d. <http://smart.knet.ca/satellite/?body=http://smart.knet.ca/satellite/>

Aboriginal Connectivity Strategy (AANDC), K-Net, n.d. <http://meeting.knet.ca/mp19/mod/book/view.php?id=4053?body=http://meeting.knet.ca/mp19/mod/book/view.php?id=4053>

Fundamentals of Satellite Communications, Part 1, MITEQ, Inc., 29 May 2008 <http://www.ieee.li/pdf/viewgraphs/fundamentals_satellite_communication_part_1.pdf>

The Future of High Throughput Satellites for Service Providers, Newtec, 27 November 2013 <http://www.newtec.eu/article/article/the-future-of-high-throughput-satellites-for-service-providers>

Northern Connectivity Ensuring Quality Communications, Nordicity, 1 January 2014 <http://northernconnectivity.ca/resources/ncis_wg_report.pdf>

Wireless Backhaul, Trunking and Video Offload via Satellite, 8th Edition, Northern Sky Research, 1 May 2014
<http://www.nsr.com/research-reports/satellite-communications/wireless-backhaul-trunking-and-video-offload-via-satellite-8th-edition/>

NORTHWESTEL INC. NETWORK MODERNIZATION PLAN FOR YEARS 2013 TO 2017, Abridged Version, Northwestel Inc., 31 March 2014 <http://www.crtc.gc.ca/otf/eng/2014/8638/C12-201400499.htm>

Northern Connections: Broadband and Canada's Digital Divide, Public Policy Forum, 1 February 2014 <http://www.ppforum.ca/sites/default/files/Background%20report%20-%20discussion%20paper%2C%20February%2018%202014.pdf>

Earth Station Performance Requirements, SES WORLD SKIES, n.d. <http://www.ses.com/3829592/es_performance_requirements.pdf>

Pre Feasibility Telecommunications Study High Capacity Network Options in Nunavik, Salter Global Consulting Incorporated, 1 September 2013 <http://www.krg.ca/images/stories/docs/Tamaani%20Reports/SGC%20Nunavik%20Final%20Report%20v15%20Public.pdf>

Executive summaries of market trends and opportunities in key market segments and regions worldwide, Satellite Markets & Research, 1 May 2014 <http://www.satellitemarkets.com/pdf2014/canada-marketbrief-2014.pdf>

An Assessment of the Socioeconomic Impact of Internet Connectivity in Nunavut, Strategic Networks Group, 31 March 2012 <http://www.qfile.ca/p/42424/Workspaces/web_docs/An%20assessment%20of%20the%20socioeconomic%20impact%20of%20Internet%20connectivity%20in%20Nunavut%20-%20FInal%20Report.pdf>

TELESAT CANADA - FORBEARANCE FROM THE REGULATION OF RF CHANNEL SERVICES, Telecom Decision CRTC 98-24, 17 December 1998

TELESAT CANADA - TRANSITIONAL REGULATORY FRAMEWORK AND FORBEARANCE FOR FIXED SATELLITE SERVICES, Telecom Decision CRTC 99-6, 25 May 1999

Appointment of an Inquiry Officer to review matters related to transport services provided by satellite, Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2014-44, 6 February 2014

Northwestel Inc. - Regulatory Framework, Modernization Plan, and related matters, Telecom Regulatory Policy CRTC 2013-711, 18 December 2013

Mapping the Long-Term Options for Canada's North: Telecommunications and Broadband Connectivity, The Conference Board of Canada, 1 August 2013 <http://www.conferenceboard.ca/e-library/abstract.aspx?did=5654>

Rising Transponder Prices Mask Regional Disparity, de Selding, Peter B., 23 August 2012
<http://www.spacenews.com/article/rising-transponder-prices-mask-regional-disparity>

iDirect Ka-band Satellite Strategy, iDirect, 1 July 2011
<http://www.idirect.net/~/media/Files/White%20Papers/KA-band_Dave_Bettinger01162012.ashx>

National Satellite Initiative, First Nations Emergency Services Society of BC, n.d. <http://fness.bc.ca/satellite/?body=http://fness.bc.ca/satellite/>


Appendix B

List of Satellite dependent communities
Community Identifier Community Region Population Households Latitude Longitude
80 Beaver First Nation AB 393 145 58.468 -116.571
108 Beaver Lake Cree Nation AB 345 107 54.669 -111.871
98 Babine - Fort Babine BC     55.318296 -126.625094
#N/A Babine - Tachet BC        
87 Bob Quinn Lake BC 248 97 56.972892 -130.253271
181 Da'naxda'wx BC     50.569503 -126.611741
194 Ditidaht BC     48.8097 -124.671002
#N/A Gwawaenuk Tribe BC 17 3    
#N/A Halfway River First Nation BC 163 61    
191 Hesquiaht BC 5 1 49.39746 -126.46895
132 Kluskus BC 39 13 53.047176 -124.704346
86 Kwadacha BC 284 99 57.423071 -125.62706
186 Nuchatlaht BC     49.868136 -126.802187
83 Prophet River BC 129 49 58.09664 -122.71261
184 Samahquam BC     50.09768 -122.536011
185 Skatin BC     49.941685 -122.410189
97 Takla Lake First Nation BC 79 94 55.483226 -125.96649
178 Tlatlasikwala BC     50.916554 -127.933162
88 Tsay Keh Dene BC     56.899053 -124.962396
193 Uchucklesaht BC 28 20 48.89853 -125.275062
84 Barren Lands MB 391 90 57.935 -101.733
152 Berens River MB 1851 301 52.349 -97.025
183 Birdtail Sioux MB 464 119 50.265 -101.163
164 Bloodvein MB 1003 168 51.777 -96.695
85 Brochet MB     57.88055 -101.67082
102 Bunibonibee Cree Nation MB 2288 434 54.949 -95.261
180 Fisher River MB 1793 501 50.603 -96.336
118 Gamblers MB 66 34 53.857 -94.659
117 Garden Hill MB     53.874049 -94.648982
107 God's Lake MB     54.6704 -94.15452
109 God's Narrows (God's River?) MB     54.55537 -94.47943
92 Granville Lake MB 16 5 56.23091 -100.57111
161 Hollow Water MB 1067 181 51.903 -97.308
161 Kinonjeoshtegon First Nation MB 346 83 51.903 -97.308
79 Lac Brochet MB     58.61549 -101.499661
168 Little Grand Rapids MB 1193 216 51.679 -98.581
105 Manto Sipi Cree Nation MB 682 101 54.839 -94.063
91 Marcel Colomb First Nation MB 15 Unknown 56.495 -100.342
96 Mathias Colomb MB 2162 341 55.732 -101.316
121 Moose Lake MB     53.70457 -100.31093
122 Mosakahiken Cree Nation MB 1429 204 53.694 -100.331
111 Northlands MB 857 124 53.984 -97.809
111 Norway House Cree Nation MB 5395 1169 53.984 -97.809
173 O-Chi-Chak-Ko-Sipi First Nation MB 563 135 51.509 -99.229
103 Oxford House MB     54.94874 -95.26548
157 Pauingassi First Nation MB 560 88 52.1555 -95.3789
136 Poplar River First Nation MB 1245 260 52.996 -97.283
95 Pukatawagan MB     55.742 -101.31657
110 Red Sucker Lake MB 869 207 54.164 -93.557
142 Sapotaweyak Cree Nation MB 964 226 52.738 -100.699
75 Sayisi Dene First Nation MB 312 118 58.717 -98.489
94 Shamattawa First Nation MB 1294 142 55.846 -92.072
187 Sioux Valley Dakota Nation MB 1429 364 49.853 -100.497
160 Skownan First Nation MB 709 108 51.958 -99.604
113 St. Theresa Point MB 3434 532 53.938 -94.834
76 Tadoule Lake  (Churchhill 1) MB     58.71214 -98.48031
175 Tootinaowaziibeeng Treaty Reserve MB 621 101 51.223 -100.958
116 Wasagamack First Nation MB 1675 244 53.885 -94.922
179 Waywayseecappo First Nation Treaty Four - 1874 MB 1416 420 50.675 -100.927
150 Wuskwi Sipihk First Nation MB 203 60 52.511 -100.862
153 Battle Harbour NL 1 1 52.2723 -55.58419
124 Black Tickle NL 26 10 53.4681 -55.77653
146 Burke Island NL 28 11 52.57713 -55.72994
155 Cape Charles NL 40 16 52.21883 -55.64056
171 Capstan Island NL 39 16 51.5702 -56.73301
126 Domino NL 105 42 53.46038 -55.7663
123 Eagle River NL 107 43 53.61658 -57.41751
148 Francis Harbour NL 15 6 52.563 -55.72216
145 Georges Cove NL 35 14 52.58084 -55.75374
133 Hawke Harbour NL 18 7 53.04197 -55.81119
147 Kings Cove, Labrador NL 20 8 52.57494 -55.74283
174 L'Anse Amour NL 6 3 51.46801 -56.87219
154 Lodge Bay, Labrador NL 78 29 52.23236 -55.84986
129 Mud Lake NL 54 22 53.30897 -60.16778
139 Norman's Bay NL 11 4 52.93676 -55.90739
127 Paradise River NL 20 8 53.42492 -57.23358
143 Pincents Arm NL 53 18 52.68879 -55.88971
170 Pinware NL 107 43 51.62403 -56.70817
165 Pinware River NL 4 2 51.74658 -56.63025
159 Pitts Harbour NL 22 9 52.01687 -55.89008
166 Red Bay NL 194 78 51.74463 -56.42601
125 Salmon Bight NL 15 6 53.4618 -55.78641
149 Williams Harbour NL 18 8 52.56026 -55.77411
16 Aklavik NT 2 Unknown 68.21820068400 -135.00646972700
24 Behdzi Ahda" First Nation NT 2 Unknown 67.02001953100 -126.07000732400
23 Colville Lake NT 126 35 67.03885 -126.09165
38 Dechi Laot'i First Nations NT 0 Unknown 64.08758544900 -114.19567871100
56 Deh Gah Gotie Dene Council NT 7 Unknown 61.35821533200 -117.65979003900
28 Deline NT 525 173 65.189586 -123.429932
29 Deline First Nation NT 3 Unknown 65.18823242200 -123.42486572300
45 Dog Rib Rae NT 6 Unknown 62.83001709000 -116.04998779300
26 Fort Good Hope NT 4 Unknown 66.25000000000 -128.61999511700
35 Gamèti NT 283 71 64.11439 -117.3559
36 Gameti First Nation NT 0 Unknown 64.11240100000 -117.35389700000
21 Gwichya Gwich'in NT 7 Unknown 67.44519043000 -133.73657226600
15 Inuvik Native NT 3 Unknown 68.41021728500 -133.81469726600
55 Jean Marie River First Nation NT 0 Unknown 61.49138888900 -120.64944444400
63 Ka'a'gee Tu First Nation NT 0 Unknown 60.94000244100 -117.41668701200
53 Liidlii Kue First Nation NT 3 Unknown 61.84521484400 -121.34960937500
48 Lutsel K'e Dene First Nation NT 11 Unknown 62.41638183600 -110.69219970700
49 Lutselk'e NT 318 111 62.405692 -110.738657
60 Nahanni Butte NT 1 Unknown 61.04998779300 -123.38000488300
62 Nahanni Butte NT 115 35 61.03517 -123.38362
10 Paulatuk NT 294 75 69.33472222 -124.0616667
42 Pehdzeh Ki First Nation NT 1 Unknown 63.21258544900 -123.43048095700
5 Sachs Harbour NT 122 45 71.98638889 -125.2316667
68 Sambaa K'e (Trout Lake) Dene NT 0 Unknown 60.45538330100 -121.20147705100
22 Tetlit Gwich'in NT 7 Unknown 67.43121337900 -134.87548828100
69 Trout Lake NT 86 30 60.442 -121.24713
30 Tulita Dene NT 5 Unknown 64.90002441400 -125.57000732400
6 Ulukhaktok NT 398 174 70.75 -117.8152778
33 Wekw eèti NT 137 35 64.190278 #VALUE!
43 Wha Ti First Nation NT 0 Unknown 63.16003418000 -117.25360107400
3 Arctic Bay NU 690 161 73.03704 -85.15032
59 Arviat NU 2060 453 61.109069 -94.056867
31 Baker Lake NU 1728 450 64.31837 -96.02569
11 Cambridge Bay NU 1477 449 69.11347 -105.11799
32 Cape Dorset NU 1236 321 64.22923 -76.55464
41 Chesterfield Inlet NU 332 100 63.34093 -90.69988
7 Clyde River NU 820 173 70.47356 -68.58565
34 Coral Harbour NU 769 195 64.136495 -83.160435
13 Gjoa Haven NU 1064 237 68.6262 -95.87841
1 Grise Fiord NU 141 48 76.41606 -82.89026
12 Hall Beach NU 654 146 68.76263 -81.2281
9 Igloolik NU 1538 329 69.37738 -81.79736
39 Iqaluit NU 6184 2074 63.75157 -68.52456
44 Kimmirut NU 411 113 62.847006 -69.870141
14 Kugaaruk NU 688 134 68.535038 -89.824899
17 Kugluktuk NU 1302 359 67.8021604 -115.1309234
27 Pangnirtung NU 1325 365 66.14519 -65.70967
4 Pond Inlet NU 1315 311 72.70009 -77.95819
20 Qikiqtarjuaq NU 473 136 67.558298 -64.023438
46 Rankin Inlet NU 2358 655 62.80974 -92.08419
25 Repulse Bay NU 748 136 66.52638 -86.23856
2 Resolute Bay NU 229 67 74.695735 -94.831086
90 Sanikiluaq NU 744 160 56.543482 -79.224272
8 Taloyoak NU 809 185 69.537557 -93.534403
50 Whale Cove NU 353 91 62.242337 -92.600441
196 Algonquins of Pikwakanagan NOTE1 ON 424 190 45.551 -77.222
114 Bearskin Lake NOTE2 ON 446 159 53.916 -90.972
192 Big Grassy NOTE3 ON 263 104 49.054 -94.307
190 Biinjitiwaabik Zaaging Anishinaabek ON 330 80 49.444 -88.131
167 Cat Lake NOTE4 ON 552 120 51.725 -91.813
197 Chippewas of Georgina Island ON 190 112 44.375 -79.294
144 Deer Lake NOTE5 ON 983 224 52.617 -94.059
172 Eabametoong First Nation ON 1385 275 51.559 -87.888
93 Fort Severn ON 506 94 55.994 -87.619
188 Ginoogaming First Nation NOTE6 ON 193 54 49.729 -86.512
135 Kee-Way-Win ON 513 115 52.999 -92.801
134 Kingfisher NOTE7 ON 466 123 53.027 -89.841
119 Kitchenuhmaykoosib Inninuwug NOTE8 ON 995 294 53.817 -89.875
169 Martin Falls ON 332 103 51.657 -85.918
195 Michipicoten NOTE9 ON 55 40 47.991 -84.901
177 Mishkeegogamang NOTE10 ON 1085 112 51.065 -90.273
128 Muskrat Dam Lake NOTE11 ON 221 89 53.362 -91.847
156 Neskantaga First Nation ON 323 85 52.2074 -87.9017
141 Nibinamik First Nation ON 38 105 52.7969 -88.4609
138 North Caribou Lake NOTE12 ON 769 267 52.957 -91.272
151 North Spirit Lake NOTE13 ON 418 72 52.505 -93.019
182 Ojibway Nation of Saugeen NOTE14 ON 82 32 50.5 -90.76
100 Peawanuck ON     55.01591 -85.41584
163 Pikangikum NOTE15 ON 2289 453 51.809 -93.984
158 Poplar Hill NOTE16 ON 496 113 52.082 -94.309
115 Sachigo Lake NOTE17 ON 484 170 53.894 -92.162
131 Sandy Lake NOTE18 ON 2416 402 53.074 -93.327
176 Slate Falls Nation NOTE19 ON 16 49 51.1693 -91.5907
189 Wabigoon Lake Ojibway Nation NOTE20 ON 185 71 49.605 -92.523
120 Wapekeka ON 396 109 53.721 -89.539
130 Wawakapewin NOTE21 ON 49 15 53.242 -89.142
137 Webequie ON 288 148 52.9851 -87.2823
101 Weenusk ON 6 81 54.99 -85.43
140 Wunnumin NOTE22 ON 539 135 52.852 -89.286
64 Akulivik QC 103 507 60.8177 -78.1442
74 Aupaluk QC 49 174 59.3057 -69.5975
81 Inukjuak QC 330 1597 58.4551 -78.1051
47 Ivujivik QC 63 349 62.4167 -77.9167
77 Kangiqsualujjuaq QC 161 735 58.7114 -65.9928
54 Kangiqsujuaq QC 139 605 61.5963 -71.9539
73 Kangirsuk QC 116 466 60.0234 -70.0262
104 Kawawachikamach QC 586 149 54.863436 -66.761104
82 Kuujjuaq QC 697 2132 58.103 -68.4188
99 Kuujuaraapik QC 568 Unknown 55.2746 -77.7638
#N/A Lac John QC 21 10    
#N/A Matimekush QC 540 169    
72 Puvirnituq/Povungnituk QC 288 1457 60.0371 -77.2692
61 Quaqtaq QC 76 315 61.0417 -69.6399
51 Salluit QC 251 1241 62.2013 -75.6469
106 Schefferville QC 213 110 54.80765 -66.81364
78 Tasiujaq QC 62 248 58.6974 -69.9374
89 Umiujaq QC 87 390 56.552 -76.515
65 Champagne YK 11   60.755 -136.4780556
37 Dease River YK 54 25 64.09666667 -129.2949996
57 First Nation of Nacho Nyak Dun YK 2   61.35557719 -135.8807983
70 Kluane First Nation YK 2   60.17138889 -138.990221
19 Old Crow YK 118 253 67.56997 -139.82882
71 Ross River YK 2   60.068241 -132.448931
52 Selkirk First Nation YK 6   62.08944444 -136.5652778
58 Ta'an Kwach'an YK 26   61.25671 -134.6
66 Taku River Tlingit YK 87   60.73593184 -133.6438889
40 Tr'ondëk Hwëch'in YK 8   63.59539795 -139.4183333
67 Vuntut Gwitchin First Nation YK 8   60.71889677 -139.8238889
18 White River First Nation YK 3   67.57638889 -140.875303

NOTES:

NOTE1 Ka-band to one library

NOTE2 Target July 2014 to cutover to fibre network

NOTE3 T1 wireline connectivity

NOTE4 Cutover to fibre network November 2012

NOTE5 Cutover to fibre network March 2014

NOTE6 Microwave connectivity

NOTE7 Cutover to fibre network February 2013

NOTE8 Cutover to fibre network April 2014

NOTE9 Microwave connectivity

NOTE10 Fibre connectivity

NOTE11 Target July 2014 to cutover to fibre network

NOTE12 Cutover to fibre network April 2014

NOTE13 Cutover to fibre network February 2014

NOTE14 T1 wireline connectivity

NOTE15 Cutover to fibre network March 2013

NOTE16 Cutover to fibre network April 2013

NOTE17 Target July 2014 to cutover to fibre network

NOTE18 Cutover to fibre network March 2014

NOTE19 Cutover to fibre network November 2011

NOTE20 Microwave connectivity

NOTE21 Cutover to fibre network March 2014

NOTE22 Cutover to fibre network February 2013


Expense Information
  Average cost of delivering 1 Mbps of capacity to:
Community A Community B Community C Community X Community Y Community Z
Expenses related to payments to third-parties            
Payments for FSS            
Other (specify)            
Total expenses related to payments to third-parties            
Expenses related to capital (i.e. depreciation)            
Ground station            
Other (specify)            
Total expenses related to capital            
Other expenses related to delivering 1 Mbps of capacity by way of FSS            
Maintenance            
Service Provisioning            
Other (specify)            
Total other expenses            
Total Average cost of delivering 1 Mbps of capacity by way of FSS            

Note

[1] Appointment of an Inquiry Officer to review matters related to transport services provided by satellite, Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2014-44, 6 February 2014

[2] Note: all references to "FSS" in these requests for information are based on this definition of the market (i.e. FSS used for transport).

[3] Include, for example, communities where all customers receive some narrowband telecommunications services, such as voice, by way of terrestrial transport, and where all customers receive other telecommunications services, such as Internet, by way of FSS used for transport.

Date modified: