ARCHIVED - Letter
This page has been archived on the Web
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. Archived Decisions, Notices and Orders (DNOs) remain in effect except to the extent they are amended or reversed by the Commission, a court, or the government. The text of archived information has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Changes to DNOs are published as “dashes” to the original DNO number. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us.
Ottawa, 11 June 2014
Our reference: 2014-0212-2
BY EMAIL: firstname.lastname@example.org
Mr. Jonathan Blakey
Assistant General Counsel
Regulatory Law, Bell Canada
Subject: Application 2014-0212-2 – Allegation of undue preference vs Rogers Communications Inc. – Request to close associated file
Dear Mr. Blakey,
This letter is in reference to application 2014-0212-2 filed by Bell Canada under Part 1 of the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Rules of Practice and Procedure regarding an allegation of undue preference vs Rogers Communications Inc.
In a letter dated 30 May 2014 Bell Canada requested that the Commission close the file associated with its application given that the conditions which precipitated the above-captioned undue preference complaint no longer exist. In light of developments, Commission staff considers the file associated with the above-referenced application to be closed.
French-language Television Policy and Applications, CRTC
Pamela Dinsmore, Rogers Communications Inc., email@example.com
Howard M. Hacker Plazacorp Investments Limited, firstname.lastname@example.org
Jeff King, Plazacorp Investments Limited, email@example.com
- Date modified: