ARCHIVED - Letter
This page has been archived on the Web
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. Archived Decisions, Notices and Orders (DNOs) remain in effect except to the extent they are amended or reversed by the Commission, a court, or the government. The text of archived information has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Changes to DNOs are published as “dashes” to the original DNO number. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us.
Ottawa, February 1st, 2013
Our reference: 8640-M5-201213165
Mr. R. B. Banks
Mornington Communications Co-operative Limited
16 Mill Street East
RE: Application for forbearance from the regulation of business local exchange services in the Milverton exchange
On 19 October 2012, the Commission received a Part 1 application by Mornington Communications Co-operative Limited (Mornington), requesting forbearance from the regulation of 12 business local exchange services in the exchange of Milverton, Ontario.
While reviewing Mornington’s application, Commission staff found inconsistencies between the list of requested services and Mornington’s current tariff pages, as well as other inconsistencies in the information provided in the company’s application.
Paragraph 28(1)(a) of the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission Rules of Practice and Procedure provides that the Commission may request parties to file information or documents where needed.
Mornington is requested to provide comprehensive answers, including rationale and any supporting information, to the attached questions by 8 February 2013.
Original signed by
Director, Regulatory Implementation
Laurie Ventura, CRTC (819) 997-4589, email@example.com
Request for information
1. In paragraph 7 of its application, Mornington notes that the list of services and the associated tariff and item numbers listed in Appendix 1 is consistent with those set out in General Tariff CRTC 25470, Item 100.4.02, Section 170, Section 210, Section 490, and Section 820. In an appendix to its application, Mornington provided the following list of services for which it requested forbearance (with respect to business services only):
|CRTC Tariff Section Number||Tariff Item Number||Service Name|
|Section 100||Item 4.02 B1||Primary Exchange service|
|Section 110||Item 1 – 6||Service Charges for Business|
|Section 130||Items 1 -4||Construction Charges|
|Section 170||Item 2||Business Service Definition|
|Section 210||Items 1 – 5||Centrex Services|
|Section 260||Items 1 -2||Interexchange channels|
|Section 270||Items 1 – 3||Digital Network Access|
|Section 310||Item 1||Foreign Exchange Channels|
|Section 490||Custom Calling Features Business|
|Section 500||Items 1-2||All in one Bundle Business rates|
|Section 820||Items 1-3||Business Voice Mail services|
|Section 850||Items 1-4||Customer Equipment used on the network.|
Commission staff has noted the following inconsistencies between the proposed list of services and Mornington’s current tariff pages:
a. The following Sections of Mornington’s General Tariff should either be updated in the company’s online tariffs on its website, or the company should explain why there is a discrepancy between the online tariffs and those in the Commission’s files:
- Section 210 – page 6 (which includes items 4.12 to 5.01) is missing from the company’s online tariffs, but exists in the Commission’s files.
- Section 490 – Custom Calling Features Business – the company’s tariffs indicate that the associated item number is 3. However, page 1a, which includes item 3 (d), Call Waiting, is missing from the company’s online tariffs, but exists in the Commission’s files.
- Section 500 – the company has listed items 1 and 2, with the service name “All in one Bundle Business rates.” However, the company’s online tariff pages indicate that Section 500 is “Reserved,” while the service exists in the Commission’s files.
b. The company has referred to Section 260, items 1 and 2, as “Interexchange channels.” However, the heading on the associated tariff pages is “Intra Exchange Channels and Distance Charges.” Confirm the correct title for this service.
c. The company has referred to Section 270, items 1 to 3, with the service name “Digital Network Access.” However, the company’s tariff pages indicate that Section 270 is “Reserved for Future Use.” Confirm whether Mornington is seeking forbearance for this service and, if so, where in its General Tariff this service appears.
d. The company has referred to Section 850, items 1 to 4, with the service name “Customer Equipment used on the network.” However, the heading on the associated tariff pages is “Use of Customer-Provided Equipment with the Company’s Facilities.” In addition, the company’s online tariffs and the Commission’s files refer to an effective date of 1998 08 01 on page 3, revision 1.
(i) the correct title for this service, and
(ii) whether this is the current version of this page 3.
1. In paragraph 3 of its application, Mornington notes that EastLink began offering business services in the Milverton exchange during the week of 20 August 2012. In paragraph 12, the company notes that competition began in the exchange on 14 August 2012. Confirm the correct date for the beginning of competition in this exchange.
2. In paragraphs 10 v. and 11 iii., the company has provided two different figures for its total number of business access lines in the entire exchange of Milverton. Confirm the number of business access lines in that exchange.
- Date modified: