ARCHIVED - Letter
This page has been archived on the Web
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. Archived Decisions, Notices and Orders (DNOs) remain in effect except to the extent they are amended or reversed by the Commission, a court, or the government. The text of archived information has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Changes to DNOs are published as “dashes” to the original DNO number. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us.
Ottawa, November 5, 2012
File No.: 8740-J64-201213230
Ms. Andreea Badea
Iris Technologies Inc.
675 Cochrane Drive, East Tower, 6th floor
Markham, Ontario L3R 0B8
RE: Tariff Notice 9 – Revision to Local Service Request (LSR) Rejection Charge
Dear Ms. Badea:
On 22 October 2012, the Commission received an application by Iristel Inc. (Iristel), under Tariff Notice 9 (TN 9), in which the company proposed a revision to its LSR rejection charge. The company indicated that its application was filed as a Group B tariff filing.
Commission staff notes that in Review of conditions for approval of a local service request rejection charge, Telecom Regulatory Policy, CRTC 2012-523, 28 September 2012 (TRP 2012-523), the Commission specified that the threshold rates for Iristel will decrease on the anniversary of the date that the tariff was first approved by the Commission. The Commission also directed Iristel to issue revised tariff pages within 15 days of the date of the decision.
Commission staff notes that the dates associated with the rate thresholds set out in Iristel’s letter are not specific and may cause confusion for customers. Further, the effective date of the tariff should be August 7, 2012, as specified in TRP 2012-523. Commission staff also notes that a tariff application is not required when a company is directed to “issue” tariff pages.
Because Iristel’s application does not comply with the directions set out in TRP 2012-523, this file is closed.
Iristel may issue revised tariff pages, addressing the above-mentioned concerns. The revised tariff pages can be submitted to the Commission without a description page or an approval request; a tariff application is not required.
Original signed by
Laurie Venture for
Director, Regulatory Implementation
.c.: Diane Massie, Tariffs Analyst, CRTC (819) 997-4576, email@example.com
- Date modified: