ARCHIVED - Letter
This page has been archived on the Web
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. Archived Decisions, Notices and Orders (DNOs) remain in effect except to the extent they are amended or reversed by the Commission, a court, or the government. The text of archived information has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Changes to DNOs are published as “dashes” to the original DNO number. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us.
File No.: 8640-C12-201206540
To: Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, firstname.lastname@example.org Bell Canada, Bell.email@example.com
Quebecor Media Inc., firstname.lastname@example.org
RE: Requests for information pertaining to Telecom Notice of Consultation 2012-317, Forbearance from the regulation of certain wholesale local number portability services
Commission staff is of the view that additional information is required for the Commission to make determinations on the matters raised in the above-noted proceeding. Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (collectively, the Bell Companies), and Quebecor Media Inc (Quebecor) are to therefore respond to the attached requests for information, serving copies on all parties to this proceeding, by no later than
15 October 2012.
Where a document is to be filed or served by a specific date, the document must be received, and not merely sent, by that date.
Original signed by
Director, Decisions and Dispute Resolution
Bell (CRTC) 15 October 12 - 1
a) Provide the current rate and the previously tariffed rate for the Bell Companies’ port out cancellation charge.
b) For each of the years 2008 to 2012, provide the revenues received, by competitor, from port out cancellation charges.
c) For each of the years 2008 to 2012, provide the revenues that would have been received, by competitor, from port out cancellation charges under the previously tariffed rate.
Bell (CRTC) 15 October 12 - 2
In its July 2012 reply comments, the Bell Companies stated that port out cancellation charges “do not apply when a cancellation is due to a winback activity or due to an event beyond the control of a competitor.”
Describe the measures the Bell Companies employ to ensure competitors are not charged for port out cancellations due to the Bell Companies’ winback activities.
Quebecor (CRTC) 15 October 12 - 1
a) Provide the current rate and the previously tariffed rate for Quebecor’s port out cancellation charge.
d) For each of the years 2011 and 2012, provide the revenues received, by competitor, from port out cancellation charges.
e) For each of the years 2011 and 2012, provide the revenues that would have been received, by competitor, from port out cancellation charges under the previously tariffed rate.
- Date modified: