ARCHIVED - Letter
This page has been archived on the Web
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. Archived Decisions, Notices and Orders (DNOs) remain in effect except to the extent they are amended or reversed by the Commission, a court, or the government. The text of archived information has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Changes to DNOs are published as “dashes” to the original DNO number. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us.
Ottawa, 6 July 2012
Our Reference: 8663-G1-200813776
BY E-MAIL
Mr. Guy Cordeau
Téléphone Guèvremont Inc.
5025 rue Marquette
St-Hyacinthe, QC
J2R 2G7
gcordeau@maskatel.qc.ca
Dear Mr. Cordeau:
RE: Status of the implementation of local competition in Téléphone Guèvremont Inc.’s territory
In Telecom Decision CRTC 2012-37, Téléphone Guèvremont Inc. - Implementation of local competition for Cogeco Cable Inc., the Commission directed Téléphone Guèvremont Inc. (Guèvremont) to provide information and assistance to Cogeco Câble Québec s.e.n.c. (Cogeco Québec) and TELUS Communications Company (TCC) in the negotiation process, as required, in order to implement local competition as quickly as possible so that Cogeco Québec may begin operating in Guèvremont’s territory by no later than
23 July 2012.
Based on the information provided by Guèvremont on the status of its implementation plans, it is unclear whether the plans are in place to meet the 23 July 2012 deadline.
Accordingly, Guèvremont is required to submit the information in the table below, indicating the completion dates mutually agreed upon by Guèvremont and Cogeco Québec/TCC, by 12 July 2012.
| Local competition implementation milestone | Completion date mutually agreed upon by Guèvremont and Cogeco Québec/TCC |
|---|---|
| Company and competitor(s) complete their discussions on local network interconnection and WNP requirements | |
| Company files its competitor service tariffs for Commission approval | |
| Commission approves the company’s competitor services tariffs | |
| Master Agreement for Local Interconnection (MALI) signed | |
| Physical interconnection and related tests and acceptance are completed, related circuits put in service | |
| Personnel training on WNP and Canadian Local Ordering Guidelines (C-LOG) methods completed | |
| Field tests undertaken with competitor(s) on WNP and C-LOG procedures and systems | |
| All tests completed successfully and competitor(s) is/are operational as a competitive local exchange carrier in the company’s local interconnection region |
Yours sincerely,
‘Original signed by C. Seidl’
Chris Seidl
Executive Director
Telecommunications
c.c.: regulatory.affairs@telus.com
michel.messier@cogeco.com
sdesy@actq.qc.ca
choquette@comgate.com
- Date modified: