ARCHIVED - Letter
This page has been archived on the Web
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. Archived Decisions, Notices and Orders (DNOs) remain in effect except to the extent they are amended or reversed by the Commission, a court, or the government. The text of archived information has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Changes to DNOs are published as “dashes” to the original DNO number. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us.
Ottawa, 28 June 2012
Our reference No.: 8690-R28-201205204
BY E-MAIL
Barbara A. McIsaac, Q.C.
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
World Exchange Plaza
100 Queen St. Suite 1100
Ottawa, Ontario K1P 1J9
bmcisaac@blg.com
Dear Ms. McIsaac,
Re: Part VI Application between Rogers Communications Partnership and the Regional Municipality of York
On 22 June 2012, the Commission received your letter requesting that it accept the Sur-Reply by the Regional Municipality of York to Rogers Communication Partnership’s (Rogers) Reply in the above-noted matter.
Commission staff accepts your request to have the 22 June 2012 letter be part of the record. Rogers will have until 6 July 2012 to address the submissions made in that letter, including your request to have an oral hearing.
Where a document is to be filed by a specific date, the document must be actually received, and not merely sent, by that date.
Yours sincerely,
Original signed by
Mario Bertrand
Director, Competition Implementation and Technology
Telecommunications
Cc: Pamela Dinsmore, Rogers Communications, pam.dinsmore@rci.rogers.com, RCI_gr@rci.rogers.com
- Date modified: