Telecom Decision CRTC 2012-315

PDF version

Ottawa, 30 May 2012

Télébec, Limited Partnership – Application for forbearance from the regulation of business local exchange services

File number: 8640-T78-201203215

In this decision, the Commission approves Télébec’s request for forbearance from the regulation of business local exchange services in the exchange of La Guadeloupe, Quebec.

Introduction

1.        The Commission received an application by Télébec, Limited Partnership (Télébec), dated 13 March 2012, in which the company requested forbearance from the regulation of business local exchange services1 in the exchange of La Guadeloupe, Quebec.

2.        The Commission received submissions or data regarding Télébec’s application from Cogeco Cable Inc. (Cogeco). The public record of this proceeding, which closed on 19 April 2012, is available on the Commission’s website at www.crtc.gc.ca under “Public Proceedings” or by using the file number provided above.

Commission’s analysis and determinations

3.        The Commission has assessed Télébec’s application based on the local forbearance test set out in Telecom Decision 2006-15 by examining the four criteria set out below.

a) Product market

4.        The Commission notes that Télébec is seeking forbearance from the regulation of 27 tariffed business local exchange services. The Commission received no comments with respect to Télébec’s proposed list of business local exchange services.

5.        The Commission considers that 26 of these services fall within the definition of local exchange services set out in Telecom Public Notice 2005-2. Regarding the other service, Network Extension Charges, the Commission considers that it is not eligible for forbearance according to the criteria set out in Telecom Decision 2006-15 because it is a construction service, and construction services were excluded from the scope of the proceeding pertaining to forbearance from the regulation of local exchange services.

6.        Accordingly, the Commission determines that 26 of the services for which Télébec is seeking forbearance are eligible for forbearance. A list of the 26 approved services is set out in the Appendix to this decision.

b) Competitor presence test

7.        The Commission notes that information provided by parties confirms that there is, in addition to Télébec, one independent, facilities-based, fixed-line telecommunications service provider2 that offers local exchange services in the exchange of La Guadeloupe and that is capable of serving at least 75 percent of the number of business local exchange service lines that Télébec is capable of serving.

8.        Accordingly, the Commission determines that the exchange of La Guadeloupe meets the competitor presence test.

c) Competitor quality of service (Q of S) results

9.        The Commission notes that Télébec submitted competitor Q of S results for the period of August 2011 to January 2012. The Commission has reviewed these results and finds that Télébec has demonstrated that during this six-month period it

i)   met, on average, the Q of S standards for each indicator set out in Appendix B of Telecom Decision 2006-15, as defined in Telecom Decision 2005-20, with respect to the services provided to competitors in its territory; and

ii) did not consistently provide any of those competitors with services that were below those Q of S standards.

10.     Accordingly, the Commission determines that Télébec meets the competitor Q of S criterion for this period.

d) Communications plan

11.     The Commission has reviewed Télébec’s proposed communications plan and is satisfied that it meets the information requirements set out in Telecom Decision 2006-15. However, the Commission notes that the company should change the city, province, and postal code information in the mailing address for the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission, as set out in the plan, to “Ottawa, Ontario  K1A 0N2,” and include only the following telephone number: 1-877-249-2782.

12.     The Commission approves the proposed communications plan with the revisions outlined above and directs Télébec to provide the resulting communications materials to its customers, in both official languages where appropriate.

Conclusion

13.     The Commission determines that Télébec’s application regarding the exchange of La Guadeloupe, Quebec, meets all the local forbearance criteria set out in Telecom Decision 2006-15.

14.     Pursuant to subsection 34(1) of the Telecommunications Act (the Act), the Commission finds as a question of fact that to refrain from exercising its powers and performing its duties, to the extent specified in Telecom Decision 2006-15, in relation to the provision by Télébec of the business local exchange services listed in the Appendix and future services that fall within the definition of local exchange services set out in Telecom Public Notice 2005-2 as they pertain to business customers only, in this exchange, would be consistent with the Canadian telecommunications policy objectives set out in section 7 of the Act.

15.     Pursuant to subsection 34(2) of the Act, the Commission finds as a question of fact that these business local exchange services are subject to a level of competition in this exchange sufficient to protect the interests of users of these services.

16.     Pursuant to subsection 34(3) of the Act, the Commission finds as a question of fact that to refrain from exercising its powers and performing its duties, to the extent specified in Telecom Decision 2006-15, in relation to the provision by Télébec of these business local exchange services in this exchange would be unlikely to impair unduly the continuance of a competitive market for these services.

17.     In light of the above, the Commission approves Télébec’s application for forbearance from the regulation of the local exchange services listed in the Appendix and future services that fall within the definition of local exchange services set out in Telecom Public Notice 2005-2, as they pertain to business customers only, in the exchange of La Guadeloupe, Quebec, subject to the powers and duties that the Commission has retained as set out in Telecom Decision 2006-15. This determination takes effect as of the date of this decision. The Commission directs Télébec to file revised tariff pages with the Commission within 30 days of the date of this decision.

Secretary General

Related documents

Appendix

Local exchange services eligible for forbearance from regulation in this decision (for business customers only)

Tariff

Item

List of services

25140

1.4

RAFA Plan – Expanded Local Calling Area for the « Lac-à-Foin » Region

25140

1.7

Telephone Set Loss Charge

25140

2.1.7.1

Basic Services and Regional Service

25140

2.1.7.2

Specialized Business Services – Key Systems Access Line

25140

2.1.7.2

Specialized Business Services – PBX Access Line

25140

2.1.7.4

Specialized Business Services

25140

2.1.7.10

Touch-Tone Dialing

25140

2.1.8

Basic Services Provided Outside the Company’s Serving Area

25140

2.1.11

Telephone Service for Senior Citizens’ Club

25140

2.5

Telephones Available Only for Two-Party Line or Multi-Party Access Service

25140

2.6

Access to Switched Automated Private Central Network Equipped with Direct Access

25140

2.8

Télébec Centrex Service

25140

2.10

Emergency Service

25140

2.15

Service to Immobilized Ships, Trailers and Trains

25140

2.23

Telephone Number Reservation and Activation

25140

2.27

Directory Listings

25140

3.1

Intra-Exchange Distance Charges

25140

3.3.17

Toll Restriction Service

25140

3.3.18

Call Management Service

25140

3.3.19

Call Display Blocking – Per Call

25140

5.2.6.5

Call Blocking Service

25140

8.4

Internet Call Display

25140

8.7

Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN) 2B+D Télébec

25140

8.9

Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN) 23B+D Télébec – Premium Option

25140

8.11

Boreal Service

25140

8.13

Digital Exchange Access

 



Footnotes:

[1]  In this decision, “business local exchange services” refers to local exchange services used by business customers to access the public switched telephone network and any associated service charges, features, and ancillary services.

[2]  This competitor is Cogeco.

 

Date modified: