ARCHIVED - Letter

This page has been archived on the Web

Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. Archived Decisions, Notices and Orders (DNOs) remain in effect except to the extent they are amended or reversed by the Commission, a court, or the government. The text of archived information has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Changes to DNOs are published as “dashes” to the original DNO number. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us.

Ottawa, 02 November 2011

Our reference: 8690-C12-201113125

BY E-MAIL

To: See attached list

RE: Proceeding to consider a model Municipal Access Agreement, Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2011-614

Dear Madams, Sirs:

By letter dated 21 October 2011, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada, Bragg Communications Inc. (operating as EastLink), Cogeco Cable Inc., Quebecor Media Inc. (on behalf of Videotron), Rogers Communications Partnership, Shaw Communications Inc., Télébec, Société en commandite and TELUS Communications Company (collectively, the Carriers) requested an amendment to Proceeding to consider a model Municipal Access Agreement, Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2011-614,
23 September 2011 (NoC 2011-614).

Specifically, the Carriers requested that the Commission amend NoC 2011-614 such that the proceeding start with a CISC[1] process and then with a written Commission process to be determined following the issuance of CISC’s report.

By letter dated 21 October 2011, Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) requested a more streamlined process for NoC 2011-614. In particular, SaskTel questioned the need for the interrogatory and CISC stages, and suggested that a written proceeding be used to focus solely on major recurring contentious issues.

By a Commission staff letter dated 26 October 2011, interested persons were provided an opportunity to file comments by 7 November 2011, on the Carriers’ and SaskTel’s requests.

The Commission notes that the procedure set out in NoC 2011-614 requires that interested persons file an intervention by 18 November 2011. In view of the date for the filing of an intervention and the date for the filing of comments on the Carriers’ and SaskTel’s requests, the Commission considers that it would be appropriate to suspend the NoC 2011-614 proceeding while the Commission reviews these requests and any comments received in response. The Commission intends to make a determination on these requests expeditiously. Nevertheless, whatever its determination on these requests, the Commission will issue revised procedure dates for the NoC 2011-614 proceeding.

Accordingly, the proceeding established by NoC 2011-614 is suspended until further notice.

Sincerely,

Original signed by

John Traversy
Secretary General

Attachment

Distribution list

Cable Cable
info@cablecable.net

Federation of Canadian Municipalities
athompson@fcm.ca

MTS Allstream Inc.
iworkstation@mtsallstream.com

Saskatchewan Telecommunications
document.control@sasktel.sk.ca

Union des Municipalités du Québec
jboucher@umq.qc.ca

The Carriers:

Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership
regulatory@bell.aliant.ca

Bell Canada
bell.regulatory@bell.ca

Bragg Communications Inc. (operating as EastLink)
Regulatory.Matters@corp.eastlink.ca

Cogeco Cable Inc.
telecom.regulatory@cogeco.com

Quebecor Media Inc. (on behalf of Videotron)
regaffairs@quebecor.com

Rogers Communications Partnership
Ken.engelhart@rci.rogers.com

Shaw Communications Inc.
Regulatory@sjrb.ca

Télébec, Société en commandite
bell.regulatory@bell.ca

TELUS Communications Company
regulatory.affairs@telus.com

[1] CRTC Interconnection Steering Committee

Date modified: