ARCHIVED - Letter
This page has been archived on the Web
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. Archived Decisions, Notices and Orders (DNOs) remain in effect except to the extent they are amended or reversed by the Commission, a court, or the government. The text of archived information has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Changes to DNOs are published as “dashes” to the original DNO number. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us.
Ottawa, 4 July 2011
File Number: 8620-C141-200906042
BY EMAIL
Mr. Don Holkestad
Operations Manger
CityWest Telephone Corporation
248 Third Avenue West
Prince Rupert, BC V8J 1L1
Don.Holkestad@cwct.ca
Re: Request for extension to file wireless number portability implementation plan
Dear Sir:
In a Commission letter dated 5 May 2011, competitors that had previously expressed interest in providing local service or had requested the implementation of wireless number portability (WNP) in one or more of the small incumbent local exchange carriers’ (ILECs) territories were requested to indicate by 20 May 2011 whether or not they were still interested in expanding their operations to offer local service or obtaining WNP in those small ILEC’s territories.
In a letter dated 20 May 2011, Rogers Communications (Rogers), on behalf of Rogers Wireless operating as a wireless service provider, confirmed that it was still interested in obtaining number portability in CityWest Telephone Corporation’s (CityWest) Prince Rupert exchange.
Commission staff subsequently issued a letter to CityWest, notifying the company that it was to file an implementation plan with the Commission, serving a copy to Rogers, by 24 June 2011.
The Commission has since received a request from CityWest for a 90-day extension to the date for filing its plan. The Commission received no comments regarding this request.
Commission staff acknowledges that CityWest may have limited resources and that it may have been challenging for the company to complete its plans within the required 30-day period. However, staff notes that Rogers first notified CityWest of its intention to compete in April 2009, and CityWest had the opportunity to understand Rogers’ requirements at that time.
On balance, Commission staff considers that it would be appropriate to extend the deadline for CityWest to file its implementation plan by an additional 30 days, beyond the initial 30-day deadline provided to each of these companies – that is, to 25 July 2011. Commission staff has no intention of granting additional extensions.
Yours sincerely,
Original signed by
Lynne Fancy
Director General, Competition, Costing and Tariffs
Telecommunications
cc: Simon-Pierre Olivier, Rogers, rwi_gr@rci.rogers.com
Laurence Amar, Rogers, laurence.amar@rci.rogers.com
Suzanne Bédard, CRTC (819) 994-6134, suzanne.bedard@crtc.gc.ca
Laurie Ventura, CRTC (819) 997-4589, laurie.ventura@crtc.gc.ca
- Date modified: