ARCHIVED - Letter
This page has been archived on the Web
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. Archived Decisions, Notices and Orders (DNOs) remain in effect except to the extent they are amended or reversed by the Commission, a court, or the government. The text of archived information has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Changes to DNOs are published as “dashes” to the original DNO number. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us.
Ottawa, 16 June 2011
Senior Vice President, Regulatory Affairs
Shaw Communications Inc.
40 Elgin Street, #1400
Re: Shaw Communications Inc. application to eliminate conditions of licence pertaining to structural separation (Our file : 2011-0627-9)
This letter is in reference to Shaw Communications Inc.’s (Shaw) application dated 1 April 2011 to have the conditions of licence (COL) related to structural separation eliminated from the licence of its direct-to-home (DTH) service, Star Choice Television Network Incorporated (now known as Shaw Direct).
The Commission notes that the COLs in question state, among other things, that Shaw Direct will maintain sales, marketing, customer service and afiliate relations functions and personnel that are separate and independent from those of Shaw Communications Inc. (the Shaw cable distributor) and Canadian Satellite Communications Inc. (the Shaw satellite relay distribution undertaking (SRDU) now known as Shaw Broadcast Services).
The Commission notes that in Broadcasting Notice of Consultation 2010-783 (the vertical integration proceeding), some parties commented that they are dependent on SRDUs for the delivery of services that they distribute to their subscribers and requested that the Commission impose measures to ensure that SRDUs do not abuse their market power. The Commission notes, as a result, that structural separation measures may be considered for vertically integrated broadcasting distribution undertakings in the context of the vertical integration proceeding.
The Commision is of the view, based on the above, that it would be premature to issue a decision on Shaw’s application to eliminate COLs related to structural separation. Consequently, this application is suspended until a decision is rendered in the vertical integration proceeding.
Robert A. Morin
c.c. David Lewis, Free HD Canada firstname.lastname@example.org
Malcolm Knox, Allarco Entertainment 2008 Inc. email@example.com
Chris Edwards, Canadian Cable Systems Alliance Inc, firstname.lastname@example.org
Robert Hersche, Saskatchewan Telecommunications, email@example.com
Lecia Simpson, TELUS firstname.lastname@example.org
- Date modified: