ARCHIVED - Letter
This page has been archived on the Web
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. Archived Decisions, Notices and Orders (DNOs) remain in effect except to the extent they are amended or reversed by the Commission, a court, or the government. The text of archived information has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Changes to DNOs are published as “dashes” to the original DNO number. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us.
Ottawa, 5 July 2010
Our Reference: 8662-R2-200911744
BY E-MAIL
Mr. Denis E. Henry
Vice-President – Legal, Regulatory and Government Affairs
and Chief of Privacy
Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership
160 Elgin Street, 19th Floor
Ottawa, Ontario K2P 2C4
regulatory@bell.aliant.ca
Mr. Mirko Bibic
Senior Vice-President – Government and Regulatory Affairs
Bell Canada
160 Elgin Street, 19th Floor
Ottawa, Ontario K2P 2C4
bell.regulatory@bell.ca
Dear Sirs:
Re: Telecom Decision CRTC 2010-302: Application to review and vary Telecom Order 2009-497 regarding 800/888 Carrier Identification service (Decision 2010-302)
On 30 June 2010, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership and Bell Canada (collectively, the Bell companies) filed a request that the Commission stay Telecom Decision 2010-302 pending disposition by the Federal Court of Appeal of an application by TELUS Communications Company (TCC) seeking leave to appeal Telecom Decision 2010-302, and the merits of the appeal should leave be granted.
Commission staff notes that the Bell companies’ request is directly linked to the disposition of TCC’s application for leave to appeal Telecom Decision 2010-302 that is currently before the Court, and that, moreover, TELUS is seeking the very same stay relief from the Court that the Bell companies are seeking from the Commission.
In light of the above, Commission staff consider that the most appropriate course of action is to return the Bell companies’ application.
Yours sincerely,
Original signed by
Lynne Fancy
Director General
Competition, Costing & Tariffs
Telecommunications
Distribution List
document.control@sasktel.sk.ca, iworkstation@mtsallstream.com,
ken.engelhart@rci.rogers.com, regulatory.affairs@telus.com, regulatory@primustel.ca
- Date modified: