ARCHIVED - Letter
This page has been archived on the Web
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. Archived Decisions, Notices and Orders (DNOs) remain in effect except to the extent they are amended or reversed by the Commission, a court, or the government. The text of archived information has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Changes to DNOs are published as “dashes” to the original DNO number. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us.
Ottawa, 17 March 2010
Our Reference: 8662-S9-201000802
By E-mail
Jean Brazeau
Senior Vice President, Regularory Affairs
Shaw Cablesystems Limited
Suite 900, 630-3rd Avenue S.W.
Calgary, Alberta
T2P 4L4
Dear Mr. Brazeau:
Re: Part VII application by Shaw Cablesystems Limited seeking to review and vary Telecom Decision CRTC 2009-462
On 22 January 2010, the Commission received a Part VII application by Shaw Cablesystems Limited.
In Service standards for the disposition of telecommunications applications, Telecom Circular CRTC 2006-11, 7 December 2006, the Commission stated that it would categorize Part VII applications into two types: Type 1 applications that generally do not involve multiple parties or raise significant policy issues and Type 2 applications that do involve multiple parties and/or raise significant policy issues.
The Commission also adopted the following service standards for Part VII applications:
- Type 1 Part VII applications – 90 percent of determinations to be issued on an interim or final basis within four months of the close-of-record; and
- Type 2 Part VII applications – 85 percent of determinations to be issued on an interim or final basis within eight months of the close-of-record.
The Commission stated that it would inform applicants, by letter whether the application is considered to be a Type 1 or Type 2 application, and the applicable service standard.
Commission staff has assessed the above application and considers it to be a Type 1 application. Accordingly, it is expected that the Commission will issue interim or final determinations within 4 months of the close-of-record.
Yours sincerely,
Original signed by
Mario Bertrand
Director, Competition Implementation and Technology
Telecommunications
cc: Attorney General of British Columbia
Legal Services Branch
1001, Douglas Street
Victoria, British Columbia
V8W 9J7
Attention: Nancy E. Brown, Barrister & Solicitor
- Date modified: