ARCHIVED - Letter

This page has been archived on the Web

Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. Archived Decisions, Notices and Orders (DNOs) remain in effect except to the extent they are amended or reversed by the Commission, a court, or the government. The text of archived information has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Changes to DNOs are published as “dashes” to the original DNO number. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us.

 

Ottawa, 8 March 2010

Our Reference: 8622-M59-201000059

BY E-MAIL

Ms. Teresa Griffin-Muir

Vice President, Regulatory Affairs

MTS Allstream Inc.

45 O’Connor Street

Ottawa, Ontario  K1P 1A4

iworkstation@mtsalltream.com

Dear Ms. Griffin-Muir:

Re:   Application for Clarification of Paragraph 48 of Telecom Decision CRTC 2007-10

The Commission received a Part VII application by MTS Allstream Inc. on 15 January 2010.

In Service standards for the disposition of telecommunications applications, Telecom Circular CRTC 2006-11, 7 December 2006, the Commission stated that it would categorize Part VII applications into two types:  Type 1 applications that generally do not involve multiple parties or raise significant policy issues and Type 2 applications that do involve multiple parties and/or raise significant policy issues.

The Commission also adopted the following service standards for Part VII applications:

Type 1 Part VII applications – 90 percent of determinations to be issued on an interim or final basis within four months of the close-of-record; and

Type 2 Part VII applications – 85 percent of determinations to be issued on an interim or final basis within eight months of the close-of-record.

The Commission stated that it would inform applicants, by letter, within 10 days of the end of the comment period for applications, whether the application is considered to be a Type 1 or Type 2 application, and the applicable service standard.

Commission staff has assessed the above application and considers it to be a Type 1 application.  Accordingly, it is expected that the Commission will issue interim or final determinations within four months of the close-of-record.

Yours sincerely,

Original signed by

Mario Bertrand

Director, Competition Implementation and Technology

Telecommunications

cc: Maria Sbrocchi, AT&T Canada mariasbrocchi@att.com

Mirko Bibic, Bell Canada bell.regulatory@bell.ca  

Denis Henry, Bell Aliant Regional Communications regulatory@bell.aliant.ca

Ken Engelhart, Rogers Communications Inc. rci.regulatory@rci.rogers.com

Robert Hersche, SaskTel document.control@sasktel.sk.ca

Michel Gilbert, Telebec reglementa@telebec.com

Ted Woodhead, TELUS Communications Company regulatory.affairs@telus.com

Date modified: