ARCHIVED - Letter
This page has been archived on the Web
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. Archived Decisions, Notices and Orders (DNOs) remain in effect except to the extent they are amended or reversed by the Commission, a court, or the government. The text of archived information has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Changes to DNOs are published as “dashes” to the original DNO number. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us.
Ottawa, 23 November 2009
Our Reference: 8740-T66-200907438
BY E-MAIL
Mr. Orest Romaniuk
Vice President and Controller
Regulatory Finance and Economic Affairs
TELUS Communications Company
21 – 10020-100 Street NW
Edmonton, Alberta T5J 0N5
orest.romaniuk@telus.com
RE: TCC Tariff Notice 361, Former TCI Tariff Notice 623 and TCBC Tariff Notice 4330 – Construction Charges
Dear Mr. Romaniuk:
Please find enclosed further interrogatories addressing issues with the above noted tariff notices.
Responses to these interrogatories are to be filed with the Commission on or before 4 December 2009.
Yours sincerely,
Original signed by Christine Bailey
for
Suzanne Bédard
Senior Manager, Tariffs
Telecommunications
cc: Brendan Keown CRTC, (819) 818 953-4945, Brendan.keown@crtc.gc.ca
Hal Reirson TCC, hal.reirson@telus.com
Attach (1)
ATTACHMENT
Telus Communications Company TN 361, Former TCI TN 623 and TCBC TN 4330 Interrogatories
Question 1
Commission staff notes that on 11 May 2009, TCC had submitted a list of Held Orders in Alberta and British Columbia. Should the Commission approve the above tariff notices, what does the company propose to charge for the facilities’ construction associated with those and other current held orders received prior to the tariff implementation date?
Question 2
If the company was to propose a grandfathering of the previous tariffs to accommodate the existing customer charges for facility construction, provide specific end date or period for which the current rate will still apply.
Question 3
If the company was to propose that the current tariffs remain in effect for previously placed construction orders, then in effect two “rates” would be charged for similar construction, provide an estimate of the impact on the price cap indices.
- Date modified: