Search

ARCHIVED - Letter

This page has been archived on the Web

Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. Archived Decisions, Notices and Orders (DNOs) remain in effect except to the extent they are amended or reversed by the Commission, a court, or the government. The text of archived information has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Changes to DNOs are published as “dashes” to the original DNO number. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us.

Archived

This page has been archived on the Web.

Ottawa, 14 August 2009

 

File No.: 8740-C6-200910564

 

BY E- MAIL

 

Mr. Michel Messier

Director, Regulatory Affairs, Telecommunications

Cogeco Cable Inc.

5 Place Ville Marie, Suite 1700

Montréal, Québec   H3B 0B3

telecom.regulatory@cogeco.com

 

Dear Mr. Messier: 

 

Re: Cogeco Cable Inc. Tariff Notice 26 - Third Part Internet Access Service

 

On 24 July 2009, the Commission received an application by Cogeco Cable Inc. (Cogeco) under cover of Tariff Notice 26 (TN 26) in which Cogeco proposed to introduce a new high-speed Internet option that would provide speeds up to 50 Mbps download and up to 1.5 Mbps upload. Tariff Notice 26 received interim approval in Telecom Order CRTC 2009-473, dated 5 August 2009.

 

Cogeco is requested to provide a response to the attached interrogatories by 28 August 2009.  

 

Yours sincerely,

 

Original signed by 

 

Yvan Davidson

Senior Manager, Competitor Services and Costing

Telecommunications

 

c.c.:   Donald Heale, CRTC, (819) 997-2755, donald.heale@crtc.gc.ca

 

Attachment (1)


Attachment

 

Interrogatories

 

  1. Provide the service costs used to support the company's proposed rates for its introduction of the new 50 Mbps (download) and 1.5Mbps (upload) service, along with the associated cost methodology and assumptions.

  2. Describe how Cogeco's retail VOIP [digital voice] services are provisioned on Cogeco's network, explaining whether the VOIP traffic runs on the network that Cogeco uses to provide its Internet services, or whether it is carried over a separate managed network.   If Cogeco's retail VOIP [digital voice] service runs on the network Cogeco uses to provide its Internet services, explain whether Cogeco includes VOIP service usage by its retail end-users when calculating its retail excessive usage billing charges? If not, explain why.
Date modified: