ARCHIVED - Letter
This page has been archived on the Web
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. Archived Decisions, Notices and Orders (DNOs) remain in effect except to the extent they are amended or reversed by the Commission, a court, or the government. The text of archived information has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Changes to DNOs are published as “dashes” to the original DNO number. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us.
File Number: 8646-C12-200815400
Ottawa, 12 February 2009
By electronic mail
To: Interested Parties List - Public Notice 2008-19
Re: Review of the Internet traffic management practices of Internet service providers
This letter serves to issue revised tables to correct minor transcription errors (changes marked in bold) from the letter dated 11 February 2009 for the above-noted proceeding.
Yours sincerely,
(Original signed by)
Chris Seidl
Director, Convergence Policy
c.c.: Stephan Meyer, CRTC 8199974494
Attachment
______________(CRTC) 04Dec2008-1 (b)
|
Period |
% HTTP/ Streaming Traffic |
% P2P Traffic |
% UDP Traffic |
% Other Traffic |
Company A |
First Month |
29 |
45 |
4 |
22 |
Middle Month |
29 |
46 |
4 |
21 |
|
Last Month |
31 |
47 |
5 |
17 |
|
Company B |
First Month |
50 |
34 |
4 |
11 |
Middle Month |
54 |
31 |
4 |
11 |
|
Last Month |
59 |
32 |
5 |
4 |
|
Company C |
First Month |
39 |
28 |
- |
34 |
Middle Month |
46 |
21 |
- |
33 |
|
Last Month |
48 |
23 |
3 |
25 |
|
Company D |
First Month |
28 |
34 |
- |
37 |
Middle Month |
29 |
51 |
- |
19 |
|
Last Month |
32 |
43 |
- |
25 |
______________(CRTC) 04Dec2008-2 (c)
|
Period |
Percentage of total traffic attributable to the top 5% end-users |
Percentage of total traffic attributable to the top 10% end-users |
Company A |
First Month |
51 |
68 |
Middle Month |
50 |
67 |
|
Last Month |
45 |
61 |
|
Company B |
First Month |
37 |
71 |
Middle Month |
42 |
64 |
|
Last Month |
52 |
78 |
|
Company C |
First Month |
42 |
56 |
Middle Month |
41 |
56 |
|
Last Month |
34 |
53 |
|
Company D |
First Month |
44 |
60 |
Middle Month |
44 |
60 |
|
Last Month |
37 |
52 |
|
Company E |
First Month |
54 |
72 |
Middle Month |
50 |
68 |
|
Last Month |
45 |
62 |
|
Company F |
First Month |
56 |
72 |
Middle Month |
47 |
63 |
|
Last Month |
37 |
53 |
|
Company G |
First Month |
45 |
63 |
Middle Month |
43 |
60 |
|
Last Month |
41 |
59 |
|
Company H |
First Month |
60 |
73 |
Middle Month |
63 |
76 |
|
Last Month |
56 |
74 |
|
Company I |
First Month |
53 |
73 |
Middle Month |
54 |
73 |
|
Last Month |
54 |
68 |
|
Company J |
First Month |
49 |
65 |
Middle Month |
48 |
64 |
|
Last Month |
42 |
57 |
______________(CRTC) 04Dec2008-2 (d)
Top 5% End-Users
|
Period |
% HTTP/ Streaming Traffic |
% P2P Traffic |
% UDP Traffic |
% Other Traffic |
Company A |
First Month |
18 |
66 |
- |
16 |
Middle Month |
16 |
64 |
- |
19 |
|
Last Month |
18 |
58 |
- |
25 |
|
Company B |
First Month |
31 |
52 |
4 |
13 |
Middle Month |
33 |
48 |
6 |
13 |
|
Last Month |
34 |
56 |
6 |
4 |
|
Company C |
First Month |
14 |
57 |
4 |
25 |
Middle Month |
15 |
58 |
4 |
23 |
|
Last Month |
16 |
58 |
5 |
19 |
- Date modified: