ARCHIVED - Letter
This page has been archived on the Web
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. Archived Decisions, Notices and Orders (DNOs) remain in effect except to the extent they are amended or reversed by the Commission, a court, or the government. The text of archived information has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Changes to DNOs are published as “dashes” to the original DNO number. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us.
Ottawa, 6 February 2009
File No.: 8690-T66-200814774
By email
Mr. Ted Woodhead
Vice-President, Telecom Policy and Regulatory Affairs
215 Slater Street, 8th Floor
Ottawa, Ontario
K1P 0A6
Regulatory.affairs@telus.com
Dear Mr. Woodhead:
Re: Application seeking an order to direct the ILECs to file new costs, terms and conditions for support structure service
On 30 October 2008, the Commission received the above-mentioned Part VII application by TELUS Communications Company.
In Service standards for the disposition of telecommunications applications, Telecom Circular CRTC 2006-11, 7 December 2006, the Commission stated that it would categorize Part VII applications into two types: Type 1 applications that generally do not involve multiple parties or raise significant policy issues and Type 2 applications that do involve multiple parties and/or raise significant policy issues
The Commission also adopted the following service standards for Part VII applications:
- Type 1 Part VII applications – 90 percent of determinations to be issued on an interim or final basis within four months of the close-of-record; and
- Type 2 Part VII applications – 85 percent of determinations to be issued on an interim or final basis within eight months of the close-of-record.
The Commission stated that it would inform applicants, by letter, whether the application is considered to be a Type 1 or Type 2 application, and the applicable service standard.
Commission staff has assessed the above application and considers it to be a Type 2 application
Yours sincerely,
Original signed by
Yvan Davidson
Senior Manager, Competitor Services and Costing
Telecommunications
cc: Daphne Fry, CRTC, (819) 953-9675, Daphne.Fry@CRTC.gc.ca
Distribution list: Attachment
- Date modified: