ARCHIVED - Telecom Commission Letter - 8661-M22-200808991

This page has been archived on the Web

Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. Archived Decisions, Notices and Orders (DNOs) remain in effect except to the extent they are amended or reversed by the Commission, a court, or the government. The text of archived information has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Changes to DNOs are published as “dashes” to the original DNO number. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us.

Letter

Ottawa, 6 August 2008

File No.: 8661-M22-200808991

By email

Mr. Claude Beauregard
General Manager
Maskatel inc. and Téléphone Drummond inc.
3455, avenue Choquette
Saint-Hyacinthe, Québec
J2S 7Z8
cbeauregard@maskatel.qc.ca

Dear Mr. Beauregard :

Re:   Part VII application by Maskatel inc. and Téléphone Drummond inc. - Anti-competitive Marketing Practices by Cogeco in Drummondville and St-Hyacinthe

On 27 June 2008, the Commission received the above-mentioned Part VII application by Maskatel inc. and Téléphone Drummond inc .

In Service standards for the disposition of telecommunications applications , Telecom Circular CRTC 2006-11, 7 December 2006, the Commission stated that it would categorize Part VII applications into two types:   Type 1 applications that generally do not involve multiple parties or raise significant policy issues and Type 2 applications that do involve multiple parties and/or raise significant policy issues.

The Commission also adopted the following service standards for Part VII applications:

•  Type 1 Part VII applications - 90 percent of determinations to be issued on an interim or final basis within four months of the close-of-record; and

•  Type 2 Part VII applications - 85 percent of determinations to be issued on an interim or final basis within eight months of the close-of-record.

The Commission stated that it would inform applicants, by letter, within 10 days of the end of the comment period for applications, whether the application is considered to be a Type 1 or Type 2 application, and the applicable service standard.

Commission staff has assessed the above application and considers it to be a Type 1 application.   Accordingly, the Commission expects to issue an interim or final determination within four months of the close-of-record.

Yours sincerely,

Original signed by

Mario Bertrand
Acting Director, Competition Implementation and Technology
Telecommunications

cc:   Michel Messier, Cogeco Cable Inc.
       telecom.regulatory@cogeco.com

Date Modified: 2008-08-06
Date modified: