ARCHIVED - Broadcasting Decision CRTC 2008-342
This page has been archived on the Web
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. Archived Decisions, Notices and Orders (DNOs) remain in effect except to the extent they are amended or reversed by the Commission, a court, or the government. The text of archived information has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Changes to DNOs are published as “dashes” to the original DNO number. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us.
Ottawa, 5 December 2008 | |
Access Communications Co-operative Limited Saskatchewan |
|
Application 2008-0602-8, received 23 April 2008 Public Hearing in the National Capital Region 24 September 2008 |
|
Video-on-demand service |
|
The Commission approves an application for a broadcasting licence to operate a regional video-on-demand service largely composed of feature films. | |
Introduction |
|
1. |
The Commission received an application by Access Communications Co-operative Limited (Access) for a broadcasting licence to operate a regional video-on-demand (VOD) programming undertaking to serve Saskatchewan. The Commission did not receive any interventions in connection with this application. |
Proposed service |
|
2. |
Access indicated that the new VOD service would consist primarily of feature films but might also include other types of programming such as comedy, documentaries, animation, music, sports and adult programming. Access confirmed that it would make its VOD program offering available to customers in both official languages. While the programming would be predominantly in the English language, the applicant made a commitment to offer approximately 5% of all programming in French. |
3. |
Access stated that it would also provide closed captioning of its VOD programming to serve the needs of viewers who are deaf or hard of hearing. The applicant indicated that it would ensure that 100% of all English- and French-language titles in its inventory are closed captioned beginning in the sixth year of the licence term. Access also indicated that a minimum of 50% of all such titles would be closed captioned beginning in the first year of the licence term. Finally, Access stated that it would provide persons with visual impairments with access to its VOD programming through audio description and would seek to acquire titles with video description (also known as described video). |
4. |
In order to provide community programming produced by its community channel on the VOD service, Access requested to be allowed to devote up to a maximum of 10% of the programming offered by the VOD service to programming produced by itself or by a related person. |
5. |
Access also requested authorization to distribute and to charge a fee for programming containing commercial messages where those messages are already included in a program previously aired by a Canadian television programming undertaking, including community programming provided by Access. To that end, the applicant proposed the following condition of licence: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. |
The applicant stated that it would accept a condition of licence requiring it to allocate all revenues generated by the subscriber fee for the distribution of its community programming exclusively to the production of community programming. |
Commission's analysis |
|
7. |
VOD services are regulated pursuant to the Pay Television Regulations, 1990, which, among other things, prohibit a licensee from distributing programming, other than filler programming, that is produced either by the licensee or by a person related to the licensee or that contains any commercial messages. Nevertheless, in keeping with its general approach to give VOD licensees the flexibility to experiment with the types of programming they offer, the Commission considers that it is appropriate to permit Access to distribute programming that is produced by the licensee or a related person provided that such programming not exceed 10% of the total programming made available in each broadcast year. |
8. |
The Commission is also of the view that it is appropriate to allow Access to distribute community programming, including the commercial, sponsorship or credit messages as originally broadcast on its community channel, provided that the community programming is offered in accordance with section 27 of the Broadcasting Distribution Regulations. This authorization is consistent with the approval of similar applications with respect to the VOD services Shaw on Demand (Broadcasting Decision 2007-273), Rogers on Demand (Broadcasting Decision 2007-391) and Illico sur demande (Broadcasting Decision 2008-121). |
9. |
The Commission is further satisfied that allowing the proposed VOD service to charge a subscriber fee for a community program or a program that contains commercial messages that were already included in a previous broadcast by a Canadian programming service is appropriate in light of the fully discretionary nature of VOD services. The Commission notes that the applicant stated that it would accept a condition of licence requiring it to allocate all revenues generated by the subscriber fee for the distribution of its community programming exclusively to the production of community programming. A condition of licence to that effect is set out in the appendix to this decision. |
10. |
However, notwithstanding the applicant's commitments with respect to closed captioning and consistent with the framework set out in Broadcasting Public Notice 2007-54, the Commission is of the view that the service should provide captioning for 100% of its programs beginning in its first year of operation. A condition of licence to that effect is set out in the appendix to this decision. |
Conclusion |
|
11. |
The Commission is satisfied that the application is otherwise in conformity with the licensing framework for VOD services set out in Public Notice 2000-172. Accordingly, the Commission approves the application by Access Communications Co-operative Limited for a broadcasting licence to operate a regional video-on-demand programming undertaking to serve Saskatchewan. The terms and conditions of licence are set out in the appendix to this decision. |
12. |
As announced in Broadcasting Public Notice 2008-101, the Commission is currently reviewing its regulatory framework for VOD services. The Commission notes that once the new regulatory framework for VOD services is announced, it expects the licensee to submit an application for a licence amendment to reconcile its terms and conditions of licence with the new regulatory framework. |
13. |
Currently, the Commission expects VOD licensees to provide audio description and video description of programming as well as customer service to respond to the needs of visually impaired customers. As announced in Broadcasting Notice of Public Hearing and Telecom Public Notice 2008-8, the Commission is presently examining the issues related to the accessibility of telecommunications and broadcasting services to persons with disabilities. The Commission notes that as a result of this proceeding, it could impose additional obligations on some or all broadcasting undertakings. |
14. |
Because this licensee is subject to the Employment Equity Act and files reports concerning employment equity with the department of Human Resources and Social Development Canada, its employment equity practices are not examined by the Commission. |
Secretary General | |
Related documents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This decision is to be appended to the licence. It is available in alternative format upon request and may also be examined in PDF format or in HTML at the following Internet site: http://www.crtc.gc.ca. |
Appendix to Broadcasting Decision CRTC 2008-342 |
|
Terms, conditions of licence and expectations |
|
Terms |
|
Issuance of the broadcasting licence to operate a regional video-on-demand programming undertaking to serve Saskatchewan |
|
The licence will expire 31 August 2015. | |
The licence for this undertaking will be issued once the applicant has informed the Commission in writing that it is prepared to commence operations. The undertaking must be operational at the earliest possible date and, in any event, no later than 24 months from the date of this decision, unless a request for an extension of time is approved by the Commission before 5 December 2010. In order to ensure that such a request is processed in a timely manner, it should be submitted at least 60 days before that date. | |
Conditions of licence |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expectations |
|
Program offering in both official languages |
|
The Commission expects the licensee to make its program offering available to customers in both official languages. The Commission expects the licensee to adhere to its commitment to offer approximately 5% of all programming in the French language. | |
Programming packages |
|
The Commission expects the licensee to limit to one week the total period during which the programming in programming packages may be viewed. | |
Adult programming |
|
The Commission expects the licensee to adhere to its internal policy on adult programming. The Commission further expects that any future changes made by the licensee to its internal policy on adult programming will be submitted for Commission approval prior to their implementation. | |
Cultural diversity |
|
The Commission expects the licensee to endeavour, through its programming and employment opportunities, to reflect the presence in Canada of ethnocultural minorities, Aboriginal peoples, and persons with disabilities. The Commission further expects the licensee to ensure that the on-screen portrayal of such groups is accurate, fair and non-stereotypical. | |
Service to persons who are blind or whose vision is impaired |
|
The Commission expects the licensee to provide an audio description of all programming that provides textual or graphic information, including programming broadcast on the barker channel. The Commission also expects the licensee to acquire and make available described versions of programming, where possible, and to ensure that its customer service responds to the needs of visually impaired customers. |
- Date modified: