ARCHIVED - Telecom Commission Letter - 8640-B2-200401506
This page has been archived on the Web
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. Archived Decisions, Notices and Orders (DNOs) remain in effect except to the extent they are amended or reversed by the Commission, a court, or the government. The text of archived information has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Changes to DNOs are published as “dashes” to the original DNO number. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us.
Ottawa, 20 November 2007
To: Distribution List (attached)
Re: Disclosure of information filed in confidence with the Commission pursuant to Telecom Decision 2007-35
In a letter dated 13 November 2007, the Commission issued its determination with respect to the issue of disclosure of competitors' network presence information raised in the context of the forbearance framework established in Framework for forbearance from regulation of high-speed intra-exchange digital network access services, Telecom Decision CRTC 2007-35, 25 May 2007 (Decision 2007-35).
Pursuant to the above letter, the Commission is disclosing, in the Appendix to this letter, the information related to the Commission's disposition of Bell Canada 's high-speed digital network access (DNA) forbearance application in Decision 2007-35.
Original signed by
Cc: Mario Bertrand, CRTC (819) 994-0294
firstname.lastname@example.org ; email@example.com ; firstname.lastname@example.org ; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org ; email@example.com ; firstname.lastname@example.org ; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org ; email@example.com ; tommoss@telecomOttawa.com ; firstname.lastname@example.org ; email@example.com ; firstname.lastname@example.org ; email@example.com ; firstname.lastname@example.org ; email@example.com ; firstname.lastname@example.org ; email@example.com ; firstname.lastname@example.org ; email@example.com ; bruce.macdougall@Internetworking-atlantic.com ; firstname.lastname@example.org ; email@example.com ; firstname.lastname@example.org ; email@example.com ; firstname.lastname@example.org ; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org ; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org ; email@example.com ; firstname.lastname@example.org ; email@example.com ; firstname.lastname@example.org ; email@example.com ; firstname.lastname@example.org ; email@example.com ; firstname.lastname@example.org ; email@example.com ; firstname.lastname@example.org ; email@example.com ; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com ; firstname.lastname@example.org ; email@example.com ; Gagnon.firstname.lastname@example.org ; email@example.com ; firstname.lastname@example.org ; email@example.com ; firstname.lastname@example.org ; email@example.com ; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com ; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org ; email@example.com ; Mukul.Sarin@hydroone.com
High-speed DNA services
Wire centres that demonstrated some evidence of competition but did not meet the forbearance test set out in Decision 2007-35
Table 1: Small markets with competitive presence
Date Modified: 2007-11-20
- Date modified: