ARCHIVED - Telecom Commission Letter - 8662-M38-200710659
This page has been archived on the Web
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. Archived Decisions, Notices and Orders (DNOs) remain in effect except to the extent they are amended or reversed by the Commission, a court, or the government. The text of archived information has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Changes to DNOs are published as “dashes” to the original DNO number. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us.
LettreOttawa, 28 August 2007 File no.: 8662-M38-200710659 BY EMAIL
Mr. Steve Ward Dear Mr. Ward: Re: Mitchell Seaforth Cable T.V. Ltd. - Application to Review & Vary Telecom Decision CRTC 2007-50 On 17 July 2007 , Mitchell Seaforth Cable T.V. Ltd. (Mitchell Seaforth) filed an application under Part VII of the CRTC Telecommunications Rules of Procedure . Mitchell Seaforth requested that the Commission review and vary Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-15 - Use of deferral account funds to expand broadband services to certain rural and remote communities , Telecom Decision CRTC 2007-50, 6 July 2007 [1] , to exclude Dublin , Ontario from the list of uncontested communities. Bell Canada filed comments with the Commission on 17 August 2007 . Commission staff notes that in Service standards for the disposition of telecommunications applications , Telecom Circular CRTC 2006-11, 7 December 2006, the Commission stated that it would categorize Part VII applications into two types: Type 1 applications that generally do not involve multiple parties or raise significant policy issues, and Type 2 applications that do involve multiple parties and/or raise significant policy issues. Commission staff also notes that the Commission has adopted the following service standards for Part VII applications:
Commission staff has assessed Mitchell Seaforth's application and considers it to be a Type 2 application. Accordingly, the Commission expects to issue an interim or final determination within 8 months of the close-of-record. Yours sincerely, 'Original signed by D. Magmanlac'
Dem Magmanlac c.c: Interested parties to Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-15 [1] As amended by Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-15 - Use of deferral account funds to expand broadband services to certain rural and remote communities, Telecom Decision CRTC 2007-50-1, 27 July 2007. Date Modified: 2007-08-28 |
- Date modified: