Search

ARCHIVED - Telecom Commission Letter - 8622-T8-200709826

This page has been archived on the Web

Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. Archived Decisions, Notices and Orders (DNOs) remain in effect except to the extent they are amended or reversed by the Commission, a court, or the government. The text of archived information has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Changes to DNOs are published as “dashes” to the original DNO number. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us.

Archived

This page has been archived on the Web.

Letter

Ottawa, 17 August 2007

File No.   8622-T8-200709826

By E-mail

Mr. David Wilkie
Regulatory Analyst
TBayTel
1046 Lithium Drive
Thunder Bay, Ontario
P7G 6G3

David.wilkie@tbaytel.com

Re:   Request for an agreement between TBayTel and Kenora Municipal Telephone System regarding wireless access services

On 6 July 2007, the Commission received a Part VII application by TBayTel.

In Service standards for the disposition of telecommunications applications , Telecom Circular CRTC 2006-11, 7 December 2006 , the Commission stated that it would categorize Part VII applications into two types: Type 1 applications that generally do not involve multiple parties or raise significant policy issues and Type 2 applications that do involve multiple parties and/or raise significant policy issues

The Commission also adopted the following service standards for Part VII applications:

  • Type 1 Part VII applications - 90 percent of determinations to be issued on an interim or final basis within four months of the close-of-record; and
  • Type 2 Part VII applications - 85 percent of determinations to be issued on an interim or final basis within eight months of the close-of-record.

The Commission stated that it would inform applicants, by letter, within 10 days of the end of the comment period for applications, whether the application is considered to be a Type 1 or Type 2 application, and the applicable service standard.

Commission staff has assessed the above application and considers it to be a Type 1 application.   Accordingly, the Commission expects to issue an interim or final determination within 4 months of the close-of-record.

Yours sincerely,

'Original signed by L. Fancy'

Lynne Fancy
A/Director, Competition Implementation and Technology
Telecommunications

cc:

Kirsten Embree
Frasier, Milner Casgrain LLP
613 783 9616
Kirsten.embree@fmc-law.com

Stace Gander
Manager, Carrier Access services
Kenora Municipal Telephone System
807 467 2238
sgander@kmts.biz

Date Modified: 2007-08-17
Date modified: