ARCHIVED - Telecom Commission Letter - 8663-C12-200614439
This page has been archived on the Web
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. Archived Decisions, Notices and Orders (DNOs) remain in effect except to the extent they are amended or reversed by the Commission, a court, or the government. The text of archived information has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Changes to DNOs are published as “dashes” to the original DNO number. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us.
LetterFile Number: 8663-C12-200614439 Ottawa, 30 July 2007 By Electronic mail To: Interested Parties List - PN 2006-14 Re: Review of regulatory framework for wholesale services and definition of essential service - Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-14 Pursuant to the procedures set out at paragraph 45 in Review of regulatory framework for wholesale services and definition of essential service, Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-14-3, 16 March 2007 (Public Notice 2006-14-3), responses to interrogatories are to be filed with the Commission and served on all parties by 2 August 2007. On 27 July 2007 , the Commission received a request from Shaw Communications Inc. (Shaw) seeking an extension to the 2 August 2007 date. In its request, Shaw stated that it would be unable to complete its responses to the interrogatories within the time made available under the procedures set out in Public Notice CRTC 2006-14-3, due to the amount of time and resources required to respond to the interrogatories. Shaw requested a 7 day extension for the filing of interrogatory responses until 9 August 2007 . The Commission received a letter in support of Shaw's request from Cogeco Cable Inc. (Cogeco) dated 30 July 2007 . On review of the request by Shaw and the subsequent letter of support from Cogeco, Commission staff considers the request for an extension to the 2 August 2007 interrogatory response date to be reasonable Consequently, the procedural dates set out in paragraphs 45, 46, 47 and 48 respectively of Public Notice 2006-14-3 are revised as follows:
Yours sincerely, (Original signed by)
Robert G. Martin |
- Date modified: