ARCHIVED - Telecom Commission Letter - 8663-C12-200614439
This page has been archived on the Web
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. Archived Decisions, Notices and Orders (DNOs) remain in effect except to the extent they are amended or reversed by the Commission, a court, or the government. The text of archived information has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Changes to DNOs are published as “dashes” to the original DNO number. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us.
LetterOttawa, 6 June 2007 File Number: 8663-C12-200614439 By Electronic mail To: Interested Parties List - PN 2006-14 Re: Review of regulatory framework for wholesale services and definition of essential service - Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-14 On 1 June 2007, the Commission received a request from Cybersurf Corp. (Cybersurf) seeking a revision to certain procedural dates related to Review of regulatory framework for wholesale services and definition of essential service, Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-14, 9 November 2006, as amended by Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-14-1, 15 December 2006, Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-14-2, 15 February 2007, Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-14-3, 16 March 2007, and Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2006-14-4, 20 March 2007, and Commission staff's letter dated 7 May 2007 (Public Notice 2006-14). Pursuant to paragraphs 43 through 48 inclusive of Public Notice 2006-14, the Commission has established procedures related to the filing of supplementary material, interrogatories and associated responses as follows:
Cybersurf requested that the procedural dates noted above be revised such that:
In support of its request, Cybersurf stated that the period of time provided for the completion of second round materials in response to the extensive first round materials filed and still being filed in this proceeding, is particularly burdensome for a participant such as Cybersurf, that possesses very limited legal and regulatory resources. Commission staff notes that evidence was filed with the Commission with regard to Public Notice 2006-14 on 15 March 2007 , and that interrogatories related to that evidence were filed with the Commission and served on parties on 12 April 2007 . Staff also notes that the Public Notice 2006-14 procedural dates noted above were set out when the Commission amended Public Notice 2006-14 on 16 March 2007 . Staff considers that all parties, including Cybersurf, were fully aware of the complexity and volume of material that parties had submitted as evidence in the proceeding, as well as the subsequent procedural dates, in mid-March 2007. Staff also considers that all parties have made various commitments as a result of the schedule fixed in mid-March 2007. Staff considers that Cybersurf's proposed schedule dates insufficiently take into consideration the oral hearing scheduled to commence 9 October 2007 pursuant to paragraph 49 of Public Notice 2006-14. Were Cybersurf's request to be granted and all the dates changed accordingly, the last material would be served and filed on the second last business day before the oral hearing. In that case, in staff's view, parties and the Commission would have insufficient time, prior to the hearing, to properly review and assess such material, and could be prejudiced in that regard. Consequently, Cybersurf's request is denied. Yours sincerely, (Original signed by)
Robert G. Martin |
- Date modified: