ARCHIVED - Telecom Commission Letter - 8690-S9-200704900
This page has been archived on the Web
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. Archived Decisions, Notices and Orders (DNOs) remain in effect except to the extent they are amended or reversed by the Commission, a court, or the government. The text of archived information has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Changes to DNOs are published as “dashes” to the original DNO number. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us.
LetterOttawa, 6 June 2007 File No.: 8690-S9-200704900 BY E-MAIL
Mr. Jean Brazeau - and -
Mr. Michael R. McAllister mrm@murdymcallister.com Dear Mr. Brazeau and Mr. McAllister: Re: Part VII Application by Shaw Cablesystems Limited seeking access to highways and other public places within the jurisdiction of the District of Maple Ridge Shaw Cablesystems Limited (Shaw) and The District of Maple Ridge (Maple Ridge) are requested to respond to the interrogatory set out in the Attachment, by 6 July 2007, serving copies on each other. Where a document is to be filed or served by a specific date, the document must be actually received, and not merely sent, by that date. Yours sincerely, 'Original signed by L. Fancy'
Lynne Fancy cc: J. Mullaney, CRTC (819) 953-5255 ATTACHMENT Shaw filed as Appendix 1 to its application a Municipal Access Agreement template (the Appendix 1 MAA). Maple Ridge also filed as Appendix 3 to its answer of 30 April 2007 , a copy of the Municipal Access Agreement entered into by the City of Richmond and Shaw (the Richmond MAA). In view of Ledcor/Vancouver - construction, operation and maintenance of transmission lines in Vancouver , Telecom Decision CRTC 2001-23, 25 January 2001 , compare with reference to specific clauses, the terms and conditions set out in Appendix 1 MAA with the correlative terms and conditions of the Richmond MAA. In the comparison, indicate, with supporting rationale, which clauses of the Appendix 1 MAA and the Richmond MAA would be acceptable and which clauses would not be acceptable, as part of the terms and conditions for an MAA between Shaw and Maple Ridge. Where relevant, provide alternate wording that would address your concern. Date Modified: 2007-06-06 |
- Date modified: