ARCHIVED - Telecom Commission Letter - 8622-C12-200704321

This page has been archived on the Web

Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. Archived Decisions, Notices and Orders (DNOs) remain in effect except to the extent they are amended or reversed by the Commission, a court, or the government. The text of archived information has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Changes to DNOs are published as “dashes” to the original DNO number. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us.

Letter

Ottawa, 18 April 2007

File No.: 8622-C12-200704321

To:   Interested Parties to Public Notice 2007-3

Re:   Proceeding to consider the requirement for a network interconnection device when the incumbent local exchange carrier's network is disconnected from residential inside wire , Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2007-3, 19 March 2007 (PN 2007-3)

By letter dated 12 April 2007, the Canadian Cable Systems Alliance, Cogeco Cable Canada Inc., Rogers Cable Communications Inc., Shaw Communications Inc., and Vidéotron ltée (collectively, the Cable Companies) requested that paragraph 8 of PN 2007-3 be reworded so as to address the circumstance when any LEC disconnects another LEC's network from a customer's inside wire. The Cable Companies also requested that all other LECs registered with the Commission should also be made parties to the proceeding.

On 13 April 2007, Saskatchewan Telecommunications supported the Cable Companies' requests.

In view of the requests, the process set out in PN 2007-3 is suspended.

Parties are to file comments on the Cable Companies' requests, by 23 April 2007, serving copies on all other parties to this proceeding.

The Commission will establish a revised schedule at the time it makes a determination with respect to the Cable Companies' requests.

Where a document is to be filed or served by a specific date, the document must be actually received, and not merely sent, by that date.

Sincerely,

'Original signed by L. Fancy'

Lynne Fancy

A/Director, Competition Implementation and Technology
Telecommunications

cc:   J. Mullaney, CRTC (819)953-5255

Interested Parties to Public Notice 2007-3

regaffairs@quebecor.com regulatory.affairs@telus.com; regulatory@bell.aliant.ca; ken.engelhart@rci.rogers.com; document.control@sasktel.sk.ca; natalie.macdonald@corp.eastlink.ca; Regulatory@sjrb.ca; telecom.regulatory@cogeco.com; bell.regulatory@bell.ca; iworkstation@mtsallstream.com; cataylor@cyberus.cadgmoss@mosstar.com; david.watt@rci.rogers.com; john.lange@open-it.ca; rob.brown@citywest.ca; dmckeown@viewcom.ca; regulatory@lya.com; christian.tacit@cybersurf.com; reglementa@telebec.com; cedwards@ccsa.cable.ca; kstevens@execulink.com; andre.labrie@mcc.gouv.qc.ca

Date Modified: 2007-04-18

Date modified: