Search

ARCHIVED - Telecom Commission Letter - 8644-S9-200615388

This page has been archived on the Web

Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. Archived Decisions, Notices and Orders (DNOs) remain in effect except to the extent they are amended or reversed by the Commission, a court, or the government. The text of archived information has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Changes to DNOs are published as “dashes” to the original DNO number. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us.

Archived

This page has been archived on the Web.

Letter

Ottawa, 2 February 2007

File No.:   8644-S9-200615388

BY E-MAIL

Mr. Jean Brazeau
Vice President Regulatory Affairs
Shaw Communications Inc.
2055 Flavelle Blvd
Mississauga, Ontario
L5K 1Z8

regulatory@sjrb.ca

Dear Mr. Brazeau :

Re:   Part VII Application by Shaw Communications Inc. seeking non-discriminatory access to multiple unit dwellings by Concord Pacific Group Inc. and enforcement of the undue preference and inside wire obligations

Shaw Communications Inc. is requested to respond to the questions set out in the Attachment by 16 February 2007 .

Yours sincerely, 

'Original signed by L. Fancy'

Lynne Fancy
A/Director, Competition Implementation and Technology
Telecommunications

cc:    Jesslyn Mullaney CRTC - jesslyn.mullaney@crtc.gc.ca
        James Love CRTC - james.love@crtc.gc.ca
        Concord Pacific Group Inc. - info@concordpacific.com
        Novus Entertainment Inc. - donna.robertson@novusnow.ca
        TELUS Communications Company - regulatory.affairs@telus.com

Attach.

ATTACHMENT

  1. Provide a copy of the access agreement Shaw Communications Inc. (Shaw) concluded with the strata council on or about 15 November 2006 for the 638 Beach Crescent property.
  2. Provide detailed descriptions of the equipment and the configuration of the distribution system that Shaw (a) would have installed in the buildings at issue if it had been provided with access when the buildings were under construction; and (b) has installed or intends to install in the buildings at issue following the completion of the construction of the buildings.   In doing so, identify any differences in equipment or in the configurations of the systems under these two scenarios and any differences in the associated costs, as well as any differences in Shaw's ability to provide end-users with service.
  3. Provide a description of the various programming and non-programming services (for example, telephony, internet and/or broadcasting) that Shaw offers and intends to offer using the facilities that it has installed or intends to install in the buildings.
  4. For each of the services set out above, provide a description as to exactly how equipment and facilities installed in the building will be used to connect Shaw's main distribution plant to customer equipment in the building (such as set top cable boxes, telephone, modem or any other devices).
Date Modified: 2007-02-02
Date modified: