ARCHIVED - Telecom Commission Letter - 8662-B2-200617219
This page has been archived on the Web
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. Archived Decisions, Notices and Orders (DNOs) remain in effect except to the extent they are amended or reversed by the Commission, a court, or the government. The text of archived information has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Changes to DNOs are published as “dashes” to the original DNO number. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us.
Ottawa, 11 January 2007
File No.: 8662-B2-200617219
To: Distribution list (Attached)
The Commission is in receipt of a Part VII application, dated 6 December 2006, filed by Bell Canada to review and vary Aliant Telecom, Bell Canada, MTS Allstream, SaskTel and TCI - Approval of rates on a final basis for Access Tandem service , Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-22, 27 April 2006; Aliant Telecom, Bell Canada, MTS Allstream, SaskTel and TCI - Approval of rates on a final basis for Direct Connection service , Telecom Decision 2006-23, 27 April 2006; and, Bell Canada and TCC - Co-location power service rates , Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-42, 30 June 2006 (collectively the Decisions). Bell Canada's application was included in the same document setting out the company's submissions with respect to an application by TELUS Communications Company (TCC) dated 30 October 2006 to review and vary the Decisions.
Commission staff understands that Bell Canada failed to serve its Part VII application on all parties to the proceedings that led to the Decisions. In addition, staff notes that pursuant to the Commission's letter of 28 November 2006, the process to consider TCC's application was modified to permit Yak Communications (Canada) Inc. (Yak) to participate in that proceeding, despite Yak not having registered as an interested party, nor having participated, in any of the proceedings that led to the Decisions.
In the circumstances, the process is modified, as set out below, to allow all interested parties to provide comments on Bell Canada 's application.
The above material is to be actually received, not merely sent, by the above dates.
'Original signed by P. Godin'
cc: Parties to Telecom Decision CRTC 2003-83
Regulatory.Matters@Aliant.ca ; email@example.com ; firstname.lastname@example.org ; email@example.com ; firstname.lastname@example.org ; email@example.com ; firstname.lastname@example.org ; email@example.com ; firstname.lastname@example.org ; email@example.com ; firstname.lastname@example.org ; email@example.com ; firstname.lastname@example.org ; email@example.com ; firstname.lastname@example.org ; email@example.com ; firstname.lastname@example.org ; email@example.com ; Regulatory.firstname.lastname@example.orgLink.ca ; email@example.com ; firstname.lastname@example.org ; email@example.com ; firstname.lastname@example.org ; email@example.com ; firstname.lastname@example.org ; email@example.com ; firstname.lastname@example.org ; email@example.com ; firstname.lastname@example.org ; email@example.com ; firstname.lastname@example.org ; email@example.com ; firstname.lastname@example.org ; email@example.com ; firstname.lastname@example.org ; email@example.com ; firstname.lastname@example.org ; email@example.com ; firstname.lastname@example.org ; email@example.com ; firstname.lastname@example.org ; email@example.com ; firstname.lastname@example.org ; email@example.com ; firstname.lastname@example.org ; Taylor.Richard@cb-bc.gc.ca
Date Modified: 2007-01-11
- Date modified: